100s of titles, one news app for just $10 a month.
Dive Deeper:
Brexit: Boris Johnson warned he risks EU sanctions with assault on Human Rights Act
Measures are at heart of Queen’s Speech designed to show the UK is shaking off Brussels ‘fetters’ following Brexit
The key laws and policies announced in the Queen's Speech 2022
From Channel 4 to schools, here's a look at what has be outlined in the Queen's Speech today
Queen’s Speech key points: Boris Johnson’s cost of living race against time
Prime Minister vows to ‘turbo charge’ the economy to ease cost-of-living crisis in legislative package
The Queen’s Speech to Parliament – what to expect and what bills will be discussed
The speech will set out forthcoming priorities for the Government.
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
New Bill of Rights could be ‘problematic’ for Scotland, expert says
Barbara Bolton, of the Scottish Human Rights Commission, said replacing current laws could create ‘a whole raft of confusion and…
Queen's Speech at a glance, everything Prince Charles announced
In all, the package featured 38 bills or draft bills
Get all your news in one place
Latest Comment news:
Paul Bongiorno: It won’t be easy for Anthony Albanese, but he says he’s up for it
At his first news conference as the newly sworn in Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese assured the nation he…
Read news from The Economist, FT, Bloomberg and more, with one subscription
Learn More
Editorial: To Stabilize Employment, Trust the Market
Reforms must be implemented to tackle the challenges ahead, and provide desirable jobs for the majority of the population
Just how badly did News Corp’s attacks fail? We count the ways
The Murdoch machine was not shy about its feelings towards Simon Holmes à Court and the teal independents…
Political youthquake hits the inner cities, but mortgage belt conservatism persists
Old-money neighbourhoods have become hubs for younger generations. Did this have a pivotal role in flipping certain electorates this election?
How to take a seat off an incumbent: knock on 90,000 doors
Even the supposedly safest of seats isn’t safe from a candidate willing to put in the hard yards in the…
From analysis to good news, read the world’s best news in one place
The crossbench is dead. Greens and indies are a third force in Parliament
The House of Representatives has become a European-style multipolar assembly. The times they are a-changin’.
How Donald Trump and Joe Biden gave Afghanistan back to the Taliban
When US troops were pulled from Afghanistan it was the beginning of the end for the Afghan military and the…

This British ‘bill of rights’ is constitutional butchery that will make us all less free

By Shami Chakrabarti
 A mobile billboard van, commissioned by human rights organisation Liberty, outside the Houses of Parliament as part of their campaign responding to the proposed scrapping of the Human Rights Act.
‘Public bodies’ obligations to respect rights will be slashed.’ Liberty protesting about the scrapping of the Human Rights Act. Photograph: David Parry/PA

After years of threats and Conservative manifesto commitments, it looks like a British “bill of rights” to scrap and replace the 1998 Human Rights Act is finally upon us. “My ministers,” read the Prince of Wales in his mother’s place on Tuesday, “will restore the balance of power between the legislature and the courts.”

But scratch the surface and you find this bill of rights to be precisely the opposite – not a document to empower ordinary people in post-Brexit Britain, but a power grab by the state. Remember, this is the prime minister who once illegally shut down parliament for irritating his political agenda – for the No 10 Praetorian Guard, “legislature” is euphemism for the “executive”.

The Human Rights Act (HRA) is one of the greatest constitutional achievements of any government. Like all modern bills of rights, it constrains those in power. It draws on the best liberal rule of law traditions, as well as progressive internationalist instincts, ensuring that rights and freedoms are accessible close to home.

It incorporates the European convention on human rights into our law, meaning that anyone here can seek its protection before any public official or local court without a long and costly journey to the court in Strasbourg. What’s more, it doesn’t undermine our own legal system. UK courts must “take account of” Strasbourg decisions but they’re not bound by them. This allows domestic judges to consider our own cultural and legal contexts, while contributing to a continuing conversation about how the convention articles should be applied across Europe.

The freedoms themselves should be uncontroversial to all genuine democrats. There is the protection of life, freedom from torture, slavery and arbitrary detention and the right to a fair trial; there is the right to respect for privacy and family life, and freedoms of conscience and expression. The rule against discrimination in the delivery of the other rights and freedoms is key.

As well as achieving balance between domestic and international law, the act contains another exquisite compromise. It protects parliamentary sovereignty as the overarching principle of our unwritten constitution – it does not allow higher courts to strike down unconstitutional primary legislation.

Instead, it enforces protections via more delicate means. Legislation needs to be read in a rights-compatible way “so far as it is possible to do so”. When this isn’t possible, higher courts can only issue a symbolic “declaration of incompatibility” – leaving it to parliament to decide what to do next. A cursory scan of Hansard reveals that ministers defending indefensibly broad new powers have relied upon the very HRA duty they now want to trash.

So, if the current scheme works and actually provides the balance the government claims to want, what are they really after?

Under their plans, our courts will no longer need to read European judgments at all. The government will tell some voters it is still abiding by the convention and others that it has “taken back control of our laws”. Extreme executive cake-eating and magical thinking will license our courts to diminish rights as set out by Strasbourg but never “exceed” them. Ministers will swear blind they are complying with it, while ignoring international law.

This has profound implications for all three devolution settlements, which legally require active compliance with the European convention on human rights. It is especially dangerous for the Good Friday agreement; a treaty requiring that these rights be guaranteed in Northern Ireland. As with the refugee convention, we will remain notional signatories, but the government will limit the scrutiny of the international community and domestic courts.

Gone will be the duty to read legislation compatibly with rights and freedoms if possible and, most likely, to make declarations in the face of incompatible laws. Public bodies’ obligations to respect rights will be slashed. This constitutional butchery can hardly be described as a bill of rights at all.

New hurdles will be placed in the way of human rights claims, such as having to prove “significant disadvantage” and “good behaviour”. How many rights violations throughout world history have been justified as being either trivial (being made to sit at the back of the bus) or aimed at “unworthy” people who have been perceived as acting badly?

If this anti-bill of rights had been in place, the Godin-Mendoza decision, which famously reinterpreted the Rent Act (under the Human Rights Act duty) so as to pass tenancy protection to a surviving same-sex partner, would have been impossible. Ditto the Belmarsh ruling, with its HRA declaration of incompatibility in favour of terror suspects detained indefinitely with neither charge nor trial.

It will be sold to some voters as curtailing the rights of foreigners and criminals and to the press as free speech trumping privacy. To hell with Windrush apologies or solidarity with even Ukrainian refugees if rights are only for citizens, not humans. To hell with positive obligations on the police to protect victims of crime. This government finds such rights too expansive and constraining on the state.

Johnson may be no Machiavelli, but his so-called bill of rights is a princely deception that all decent democrats must expose.

  • Shami Chakrabarti was shadow attorney general for England and Wales from 2016 to 2020, and was director of Liberty from 2003 to 2016

What is inkl?
The world’s most important news, from 100+ trusted global sources, in one place.
Morning Edition
Your daily
news overview

Morning Edition ensures you start your day well informed.

No paywalls, no clickbait, no ads
Enjoy beautiful reading

Content is only half the story. The world's best news experience is free from distraction: ad-free, clickbait-free, and beautifully designed.

Expert Curation
The news you need to know

Stories are ranked by proprietary algorithms based on importance and curated by real news journalists to ensure that you receive the most important stories as they break.

Dive Deeper:
Brexit: Boris Johnson warned he risks EU sanctions with assault on Human Rights Act
Measures are at heart of Queen’s Speech designed to show the UK is shaking off Brussels ‘fetters’ following Brexit
The key laws and policies announced in the Queen's Speech 2022
From Channel 4 to schools, here's a look at what has be outlined in the Queen's Speech today
Queen’s Speech key points: Boris Johnson’s cost of living race against time
Prime Minister vows to ‘turbo charge’ the economy to ease cost-of-living crisis in legislative package
The Queen’s Speech to Parliament – what to expect and what bills will be discussed
The speech will set out forthcoming priorities for the Government.
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
New Bill of Rights could be ‘problematic’ for Scotland, expert says
Barbara Bolton, of the Scottish Human Rights Commission, said replacing current laws could create ‘a whole raft of confusion and…
Queen's Speech at a glance, everything Prince Charles announced
In all, the package featured 38 bills or draft bills
Get all your news in one place