Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Entertainment
Lyndsey Winship

The Idiot review – Dostoevsky's good prince makes a quivering retreat from love

Like an old cine film … Rihoko Sato as Nastasya Filippovna and Saburo Teshigawara as Prince Myshkin in The Idiot.
Like an old cine film … Rihoko Sato as Nastasya Filippovna and Saburo Teshigawara as Prince Myshkin in The Idiot. Photograph: Tristram Kenton/The Guardian

Japanese choreographer Saburo Teshigawara has created a kind of homeopathic interpretation of Dostoevsky’s The Idiot, distilled down until there’s almost nothing of the original left.

There are two people on stage: Teshigawara, as the “idiot” Prince Myshkin, and Rihoko Sato as the ultimate “it’s complicated” love interest, Nastasya Filippovna. Sixty-five-year-old Teshigawara (dressed in plain monochrome – nothing 19th-century here) captures facets of the Prince in enigmatic solos. There’s the wide-eyed innocent, walking stiltedly, arrested by the wonder around him; there’s the suffering epileptic, his body jiggering and shaking, feet frantic in a sort of soft shoe shuffle; and there’s the faithful Christian, face raised to God, framed in a single spotlight.

Dramatic contrasts … Saburo Teshigawara as Prince Myshkin in The Idiot.
Saburo Teshigawara as Prince Myshkin. Photograph: Tristram Kenton/The Guardian

Sato’s Filippovna holds herself with pride and reserve. She’s unreadable, humourless, yet Myshkin is subtly bewitched. Sato moves quickly, criss-crossing, whirling and circling back on herself and he can’t grasp her, they’re running on different tracks, different rules.

There is one fleeting moment of connection, when hands meet, but from then on the couple revolve in separate orbits, even if still held by each other’s gravity. Is the point that these moments are anomalies and yet we can spend our lives chasing them, bound to them, thinking they hold the answers? Dostoevsky’s book intentionally drops the Prince’s character, representing pure goodness, into a society of conniving selfishness to watch how each responds to the other. But in Teshigawara’s version, what we see is mostly Myshkin in isolation, and it is mostly unrevealing.

Visually, Teshigawara creates very striking scenes with minimal means, with light used in dramatic contrast or in a quivering effect like an old cine film. And yet this serious-minded work remains ultimately unilluminating.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.