Once again Alfredo Morelos found himself embroiled in controversy in the wake of the flashpoint that left Hibs' Ryan Porteous in a crumpled heap.
The Rangers striker would go on to grab the winner in the keenly contested clash at Easter Road that keeps his side 23 points clear at the top.
But it was the forceful contact with his studs into the centre-back's leg that had everyone talking and now the Colombian has been charged, facing a three match ban.
The Ibrox hero was slammed by club legends Kris Boyd, Ally McCoist and Barry Ferguson over his conduct which has often let him and his team down since he arrived in Scottish football.
It would be foolish to make a case for Morelos over the clash itself but some are pointing to a potential inconsistency between the definition of fast track complaint and what was said in the immediate aftermath of the game.
Disciplinary Rule 200 states: "Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or any other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed, the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player."
The key part here is "but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials" because doesn't chime with the post-match comments from the Hibs camp.
Darren McGregor and manager Jack Ross claimed man in the middle Kevin Clancy did see the incident take place but decided against taking action.
The defender said: "I was saying that to the referee, ultimately he’s not stood on Porteous to hurt him but he has stood on him. I seen it with my own eyes, he could easily have stepped over him, so if that constitutes a red card then it’s a red card.
"He said it wasn’t intentional and didn’t mean to put his foot there but we all know the game, and we all know where you can you can put your foot in and he didn’t need to put it into Ryan’s leg."
And Ross also revealed Clancy had told him that he had a view of the incident that took place when the game was still all square.
He said: "He (Clancy) said he thought it was a tangle of legs, which you know, I’m not going to chastise Kevin publicly for it because he only gets to see it one time and I’m sure match officials hold themselves to a high standard as well and are disappointed by it.
"Look, I just asked him and emotions were running high but he hasn’t seen it the way everyone else has seen it."
Despite the Hibs duo claiming Clancy was comfortable with his call not to send Morelos off it's also understood that match officials can provide additional information in their report on major incidents.
It may well be that the grade one official did see the incident but didn't get a crystal clear view of the moment that left Porteous in agony.
And that was picked up by former Scotland striker Chris Iwelumo in the immediate aftermath of the game.
He said: "I think his (Clancy) view is blocked a little by the right knee of Porteous. But again, you can see the intent, but we see it slowed down. It is a stamp, it is a red card, it is as simple as that, the referee got it wrong."
Morelos' fast track hearing will be heard on Tuesday.
