Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Supreme Court Sets New Test For Public Officials On Social Media

U.S. Supreme Court building is seen in Washington

The United States Supreme Court has recently ruled on a significant case regarding public officials blocking social media followers. The unanimous court has established a new test to determine when public officials are permitted to block their followers on social media. The cases in question originated from Michigan and California, involving local officials who had blocked followers that had criticized their actions.

The test set by the Supreme Court states that a public official can be considered to be engaging in state action by blocking or preventing someone from commenting on their social media page only if the official had the actual authority to speak on behalf of the state on a specific matter and purported to exercise that authority in the relevant posts. The court emphasized that this is a highly fact-specific inquiry, focusing on whether the official was acting within their official capacity and exercising government authority when blocking individuals.

The court's decision sends both cases back to lower court judges to determine whether the officials can be sued based on the established test. The ruling also addresses the distinction between public officials' government-associated sites and their private social media accounts, highlighting that the key factor is whether the official was acting in their official capacity when taking the action of blocking a constituent.

New test determines when public officials can block followers on social media.
US Supreme Court ruled on public officials blocking social media followers.
Cases from Michigan and California led to the establishment of the test.

The ruling has significant implications for public officials' social media interactions. It clarifies that public officials cannot block individuals on social media platforms if they are acting in their official capacity and purporting to exercise government authority. The court underscored the importance of public officials' right to speak publicly on matters of civic concern while ensuring accountability for their actions on social media.

The unanimous 9-0 decision by the Supreme Court reflects the complexity of the issue and the need for detailed analysis by lower court judges. The ruling sets a precedent for future cases involving public officials and their social media interactions, emphasizing the importance of considering the specific circumstances of each action taken by officials.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.