Summary
Well, it’s been... a day.
As CQ-Roll Call immigration reporter Tanvi Misra put it:
I human year = 10 immigration news years.
— Tanvi (@Tanvim) September 11, 2019
Here’s an updated recap of today’s US politics news:
- The supreme court ruled on Wednesday to allow the Trump administration to enforce nationwide restrictions that would prevent most Central American immigrants from seeking asylum in the US. As the president celebrates the highest court’s order as a victory, other lawmakers and immigrant rights activists say the move could cost lives.
- Democratic lawmakers also slammed federal immigration officials for refusing to explain why they stopped considering requests from immigrants looking to defer deportation due to medical reasons.
- In a tweet, the president announced he will be delaying implementing increased tariffs on Chinese goods as a “gesture of good will” toward Beijng.
- Trump referenced his canceled plan to hold peace talks with the Taliban while speaking at the Pentagon’s 9/11 memorial ceremony. It has been 18 years today since the attacks that claimed nearly 3,000 lives.
- Trump said his administration was moving to ban flavored e-cigarettes in an attempt to crack down on teen vaping.
- Trump reportedly pushed his staff to pressure the NOAA to back up the president’s false hurricane claim. Trump dismissed the reports as “fake news.”
- The president has offered no clarity on what gun legislation he would support, despite meeting with a bipartisan group of senators on the issue today.
- Joe Biden maintained his lead in the latest CNN polling, but he has lost his double-digit advantage on the eve of the next democratic debate, which will take place tomorrow in Houston. Biden also leads among registered voters in the NPR/PBS NewsHour Marist Poll, but trails Elizabeth Warren among democratic and democratic-leaning voters.
Tomorrow is the third 2020 democratic presidential debate. The Guardian will be liveblogging as the two top contenders — Warren and Biden — face off for the first time. Andrew Yang has also promised a “big” and “unprecedented” surprise — perhaps a new look?
Two words for the debate stage tomorrow night: Gold chain.
— Andrew Yang (@AndrewYang) September 11, 2019
The Trump administration’s acting director of citizenship and immigration services further celebrated the supreme court’s action by calling it a “YUGE Win”, alluding to Donald Trump’s particular way of speaking.
(2/x) @realDonaldTrump’s administration uses every tool in the toolbox to try and solve the crisis at our southern border. @USCIS will commence implementing the asylum rule ASAP.
— USCIS Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli (@USCISCuccinelli) September 11, 2019
The highest court’s order allowing the administration to enforce nationwide restrictions on asylum seekers would prevent most Central American immigrants from seeking protection in the US, and render ineligible refugees from Africa, Asia and South America who arrive regularly at the southern border.
Meanwhile, politicians and immigrant rights activists are decrying the move.
2020 presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke, who lives in and once represent the border town of El Paso, Texas, said, “The Supreme Court has put lives in danger.”
Trump's policy on asylum seekers isn't only racist, it's cruel—preventing some of the world's most desperate and vulnerable human beings from finding safety. With its decision today, The Supreme Court has put lives in danger. https://t.co/LjovIoudRv
— Beto O'Rourke (@BetoORourke) September 11, 2019
Representative Lucille Roybal-Allard, who chairs the House appropriations committee on homeland security, said the court is “jeopardizing the lives of coutless asylum seekers — innocent men, women, and children.”
I vehemently disagree with the Supreme Court majority's decision to enable Donald Trump's assault on our asylum system. They are jeopardizing the lives of countless asylum-seekers—innocent men, women, and children.
— Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (@RepRoybalAllard) September 11, 2019
This is not a game. This is life or death. We cannot be silent. https://t.co/GjTeiBxGnz
The Trump administration policy restricting asylum would ban everyone — including children traveling on their own — from seeking asylum in the US unless they apply first in their country of transit. In July, a federal judge in California who blocked the policy said it was unclear that Mexico and Guatemala could handle the volume of migrants passing through their countries and process their asylum claims.
Trump delays tariff increase as "gesture of good will" toward China
The president announced in a tweet that he will delay increasing tariffs on $250 billion worth of goods from China by two weeks, at the request of Beijing.
....on October 1st, we have agreed, as a gesture of good will, to move the increased Tariffs on 250 Billion Dollars worth of goods (25% to 30%), from October 1st to October 15th.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 11, 2019
Because October 1 — when the tariff increase was meant to kick in — is National Day of the People’s Republic of China, Trump announced that he’ll delay until October 15.
US and Chinese officials have agreed to continue trade talks this month.
California lawmakers approved statewide rent control, to ease the housing crisis.
California has the nation’s highest housing prices and a growing homeless population. The new bill will limit annual rent increases to 5 percent after inflation. It’s likely to be signed by the state’s democratic governor Gavin Newsom.
In February, Oregon was the first to pass statewide rent control. Maryland, New Jersey, New York and the District of Columbia are the only other states to have rent control in some localities.
Donald Trump is celebrating the Supreme Court ruling on asylum seekers as a victory, tweeting, “BIG United States Supreme Court WIN”
BIG United States Supreme Court WIN for the Border on Asylum! https://t.co/9Ka00qK1Ob
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 11, 2019
Congress has passed a bill that would permanently bar drilling off US’s Atlantic and Pacific coasts, and extend a moratorium on drilling off Florida’s west coast.
The bill is now headed to the Republican-controlled Senate, which is unlikely to act on it. Still, the legislation is a strong repudiation of the Trump administration’s plans to expand offshore drilling, from both republican and democratic members of the House .
Coastal lawmakers from both parties oppose offshore drilling, fearing another disaster like the 2010 BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
“If we don’t act, drilling rigs could soon appear off our beaches,” said Rep. Joe Cunningham, D-S.C., the lead sponsor of the bicoastal drilling ban. Cunningham won his seat last year in part because of his opposition to drilling off South Carolina’s beach-dominated coast.
“The Low Country (near Charleston, S.C.) is a force to be reckoned with, and we stand firm in our opposition to drilling off our shoreline,” Cunningham said. Offshore drilling could ruin the state’s tourism-based economy, “ruin our vibrant natural resources” and harm the state’s “unique way of life,” he said.
“Drilling off the coast of Florida would create an industrial coastline less appealing to visitors, hinder our military readiness and adversely affect our environment,” said Rep. Francis Rooney, R-Fla., co-sponsor of the Florida bill, which extends a moratorium set to expire in 2022.
The Supreme Court’s decision today undoes the lower court’s ruling blocking Trump’s asylum policy in some states along the border.
Groups challenging the policy in court say that it violates the US refugee act and the UN refugee convention guaranteeing the right to seek asylum to those fleeing persecution.
In a scathing dissent to today’s order, justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Sonya Sotomayor say that the Supreme Court “sidesteps the ordinary judicial process” by overriding proceedings in the lower courts.
Their dissent is also critical of the Trump administration:
Once again the Executive Branch has issued a rule that seeks to upend longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution. Although this Nation has long kept its doors open to refugees—and although the stakes for asylum seekers could not be higher—the Government implemented its rule without first providing the public notice and inviting the public input generally required by law.
Supreme Court says Trump administration can deny asylum while legal challenge continues
Remember when the Trump administration tried to make a rule that would essentially ending asylum protections for almost all migrants who arrive at the US-Mexico border?
The policy announced in July held that any asylum seekers who pass through another country before arriving at the southern border wouldn’t be eligible for asylum unless they first applied for projection in the country they passed through?
A federal judge in California blocked the policy.
But today, in a brief, unsigned order, the Supreme Court permitted the Trump administration to carry on with the policy while legal challenges are ongoing.
Updated
Trump formally sends labor secretary nomination to senate
The president, who has been floating Eugene Scalia as a nominee for labor secretary since July, has formally sent the nomination to the senate.
If approved, Scalia — son of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia — would succeed Alexander Acosta, who resigned over public criticism of his handling of charges against late billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
Joe Biden is leading not only in newly released CNN poll, but also in the NPR/PBS NewsHour Marist Poll.
Among all registered voters, the former vice president has the highest favorability at 45%. But Warren is a close second, at 41%.
Among democrats and democratic-leaning independents, however, Warren has the lead at 75% — up from just about 50% in January.
That’s it from me today. My west coast colleague, Maanvi Singh, will take over the blog for the next few hours.
Here’s where the day stands so far:
- Trump said his administration was moving to ban flavored e-cigarettes in an attempt to crack down on “vaping.”
- The president said his national security adviser, John Bolton, was leaving the administration because they disagreed on matters like Venezuela and North Korea, although Bolton’s stances on those issues was well known when he took the job. (Trump also laughably said he hoped the two had parted “on good stead.”)
- Trump referenced his canceled plan to hold peace talks with the Taliban while speaking at the Pentagon’s 9/11 memorial ceremony. It has been 18 years today since the attacks that claimed nearly 3,000 lives.
- Trump reportedly pushed his staff to pressure the NOAA to back up the president’s false hurricane claim. Trump dismissed the reports as “fake news.”
- The president has offered no clarity on what gun legislation he would support, despite meeting with a bipartisan group of senators on the issue today.
- Joe Biden maintained his lead in the latest CNN polling, but he has lost his double-digit advantage on the eve of the next Democratic debate, which will take place tomorrow in Houston.
Maanvi will have more on the news of the day, so stay tuned.
CNN is one of the approved pollsters for the Democratic National Committee, so presidential candidates can use it to qualify for the fourth debate next month.
But a Politico reporter noted that the results didn’t push any candidate closer to the debate stage next month.
The debate ramifications: Nothing really! Everyone who scored above 2%, save for Gabbard, has already qualified for October. Gabbard got 2% — but she's already hit 2% in a CNN national poll previously, so it won't help her. She remains at 2 polls https://t.co/RKRRj3Glu9
— Zach Montellaro (@ZachMontellaro) September 11, 2019
Biden still leads but loses double-digit advantage in CNN poll
Joe Biden still leads the pack of Democratic presidential candidates in the latest CNN poll, but he has lost the double-digit advantage he held last month as the primary race has tightened.
According to the poll, Biden attracts the support of 24 percent of Democratic supporters, while Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are virtually tied at 18 and 17 percent. No other candidate reached double digits.
Biden’s showing is still impressive, but he has slipped a bit from his 14-point lead over the second-place finisher, Sanders, in August.
The poll adds to the evidence that the primary is currently a three-way race between Biden, Warren and Sanders. The fourth-place finisher, Kamala Harris, has slipped to 8 percent.
This dynamic will likely weigh heavily on candidates’ minds when they take the debate stage in Houston tomorrow. The top two candidates in CNN’s poll, Biden and Warren, have never faced off onstage before.
Democratic presidential candidates are denouncing the Trump administration’s decision not to grant Temporary Protected Status to the Bahamians affected by Hurricane Dorian.
Let’s be clear: This decision is racist and cruel. We should grant Temporary Protected Status to Bahamians fleeing Hurricane Dorian. A Warren administration will reinstate TPS to protect refugees who are at risk in their home countries. https://t.co/aBObQAKA4r
— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) September 11, 2019
More than 70,000 Bahamians are suddenly homeless after Hurricane Dorian. They've lost practically everything.
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 11, 2019
Denying TPS status to them is heartless.
We can't grant Trump a second term.https://t.co/nudcheb5LK
Racist. Heartless. Cruel.
— Cory Booker (@CoryBooker) September 11, 2019
TPS status should be granted immediately.
The moral vandalism of this administration is bottomless. We need a new president. https://t.co/bIcrt0G9N2
Trump and the acting commissioner of Customs and Border Patrol, Mark Morgan, sent contradictory messages Monday about Bahamians receiving TPS.
Morgan said during a White House briefing he thought it would be “appropriate” to grant TPS, while Trump seemed to dismiss the idea.
Democrats quibble over defining 'impeachment inquiry'
Another debate unfolding on Capitol Hill revolves around how exactly House Democrats will define an impeachment inquiry.
The House majority leader, Steny Hoyer, sparked confusion earlier today when he told reporters that Democrats were not conducting an “impeachment inquiry.” That comment flew in the face of arguments from the House judiciary committee chairman, Jerry Nadler.
So Hoyer walked that initial comment back, saying he misunderstood reporters’ question. “I thought the question was in regards to whether the full House is actively considering articles of impeachment, which we are not at this time,” Hoyer wrote in a statement.
“I strongly support Chairman Nadler and the Judiciary Committee Democrats as they proceed with their investigation ‘to determine whether to recommend articles of impeachment to the full House,’ as the resolution states.”
But that statement also seemed to contradict Nadler’s position, as a Politico reporter noted.
This is still not technically aligned with the House's arguments in court.
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) September 11, 2019
The House's court filings say that the full House *is* considering whether to recommend articles of impeachment -- by referring articles and delegating the initial decision to the Judiciary Committee. https://t.co/hYIdMRordy
Confused? You’re not alone. House Democrats’ messaging on impeachment has become increasingly muddled, likely in an attempt to appease the progressive and moderate wings of their caucus. But the strategy is starting to irritate even fellow Democrats, as demonstrated by this tweet from a former senior adviser to Barack Obama.
The politics of impeachment are debatable. Maybe they are good. Maybe they aren't. No one knows. But I do know that the current Democratic strategy of telling the base they are impeaching Trump and telling the moderates the opposite is an absolute disaster.
— Dan Pfeiffer (@danpfeiffer) September 11, 2019
It appears Trump was similarly vague on supporting a background check expansion while meeting with a bipartisan group of senators earlier today.
Manchin said the president was “very encouraging” and “we will know by tomorrow if we can get something we can agree on.”
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) September 11, 2019
Toomey added: “The president did not make a commitment to support any particular bill.”
Toomey, a Democrat, and Manchin, a Republican, were the architects of a 2013 proposal to expand background checks to gun shows and Internet sales, which was defeated in the Senate.
Murphy, a Democrat, has been a fierce advocate for strengthening gun laws since the Sandy Hook shooting took place in his home state of Connecticut.
Trump remains vague on potential gun bill
Asked about what gun proposals he is considering after last month’s mass shootings, Trump offered no clarity, surely enraging the Democratic leaders calling on him to endorse the House-approved background checks bill.
“There’s a lot of things under discussion,” the president said. “Some things will never happen … and some very meaningful things can happen.”
On guns and background checks, President Trump says he's working on coming up with "something that's acceptable to everybody" https://t.co/H9n7JKbYS7 pic.twitter.com/4BWxKJzSOX
— CBS News (@CBSNews) September 11, 2019
Keep in mind that this was in response to a question about whether Trump would support background checks on all private gun sales. So the president responded to a very specific question with an exceedingly vague response, which doesn’t inspire much confidence about actually getting a gun bill signed.
Trump denies White House's involvement in pressuring NOAA as another outlet confirms it
While speaking to reporters in the Oval Office today, Trump was asked about the New York Times’ reporting that senior White House officials were involved in pressuring the NOAA to back up the president’s false hurricane claim.
“No I never did that,” Trump told reporters. “I never did that. That’s a whole hoax by the fake news media, when they talk about the hurricane and when they talk about Florida and when they talk about Alabama. That’s just fake news … it’s a fake story.”
But another outlet, the Washington Post, has now confirmed the Times’ reporting, adding that the president himself pressed his staff on the issue.
President Trump told his staff that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration needed to deal with a tweet that seemed to contradict his statement that Hurricane Dorian posed a significant threat to Alabama as of Sept. 1, in contrast to what the agency’s forecasters were predicting at the time, senior administration officials said. This led chief of staff Mick Mulvaney to call Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross to tell him to fix the issue, the officials said.
Trump had complained for several days about the issue, according to the senior officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.
Mulvaney then called Ross but did not instruct him to threaten any firings or make any punitive threats, officials said. He simply told Ross that the agency needed to fix the matter immediately, leading to a new statement that was issued Friday, Sept. 6.
Mar-a-Lago intruder found guilty of lying to FBI
A Chinese woman who was arrested at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s Florida club, earlier this year was found guilty of lying to a Secret Service agent and trespassing.
NBC News reports on the bizarre trial:
Jurors handed down the verdict against Yujing Zhang on Wednesday.
Zhang was arrested on March 30 after she allegedly told a Secret Service agent guarding Mar-a-Lago that she was there to use the pool. Once inside the posh Palm Beach resort she told a receptionist she was there to take pictures for a United Nations friendship event. Prosecutors said Zhang knew that the event had been canceled.
The trial had several twists and turns. The 33-year-old consultant from Shanghai fired her public defenders in June and chose to represent herself, a decision Judge Roy Altman did not like. He tried several times during the trial to convince Zhang to let her public defenders try the case but she refused. ...
She was charged with unlawful entry of restricted buildings and grounds and false statements and was convicted on both counts.
Death of T. Boone Pickens
Oil tycoon and corporate raider-turned philanthropist T. Boone Pickens, who amassed a fortune and and gave much of it away, has died. He was 91 and lately had become an advocate for renewable energy.
Spokesman Jay Rosser confirmed Pickens’ death Wednesday to The Associated Press.
Pickens made his first millions in oil, burnishing an image as a maverick, unafraid to take on giants in the oil patch.
Even his name seemed to fit, like central casting’s idea of what an oilman should be named.
Starting in the 1980s, he became known for launching hostile corporate takeover bids that often resulted in a huge payoff.
His fortune soared into the billions.
Pickens flirted with the idea of marketing water from West Texas to the state’s metropolitan areas. In a break from his past, he also developed wind farms.
In an interview with the Guardian at the Dallas offices of his new wind turbine venture 11 years ago, he said: “Don’t get the idea that I’ve turned green. My business is making money, and I think this is going to make a lot of money.”
Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Afternoon summary
A busy news morning and every chance the rest of the day will continue in the same vein. Here are the main developments so far:
- Donald Trump said his administration will propose banning flavored e-cigarettes over health concerns about vaping, especially among children. He spoke at an Oval Office briefing for reporters, with Melania Trump present.
- Gone John. Trump said of departing national security adviser John Bolton “I hope we left in good stead” after yesterday’s sudden firing of the longtime Republican hawk, over policy and personality clashes.
- At a ceremony at the Pentagon to mark the 18th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks by Al-Qaida, the president repeated a dubious claim about time spent at “Ground Zero” as the attack site in New York was known.
- Trump slammed leaders of the Federal Reserve as “boneheads”, in another attack on chairman Jerome Powell, demanding lower interest rates.
More on Trump’s tension with Bolton: the president said he bristled at the national security adviser’s positions on Venezuela and North Korea.
But those stances were well known for much of Bolton’s tenure and, in the case of Venezuela, bolstered by the administration’s own position.
For example, Trump said, “When [Bolton] talked about the Libyan model for Kim Jong-un, that was not a good statement to make. ... It set us back.” But a Post reporter noted that comment came more than a year before Bolton’s ouster.
Trump keeps mentioning Bolton's comments on the "Libya model" as being a disaster.
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) September 11, 2019
Bolton said that in April 2018. Trump kept him on for another 16 months.
Exactly. Trump also just said "I disagreed with John Bolton's attitude on Venezuela. I thought he was way out of line."
— Eli Stokols (@EliStokols) September 11, 2019
US declared Guaido the legit president in January. https://t.co/7mfgYxqr9T
Alexander Azar, the health and human services secretary, provided additional clarification on the new regulation after Trump’s Oval Office meeting with reporters.
Azar says tobacco-flavored products provide ADULT users a reasonable alternative to combustable nicotine. So it's not banned (for now). But he says "we can't allow the benefits for adults to come at the expense of our children."
— Kevin Liptak (@Kevinliptakcnn) September 11, 2019
E-cigarette companies appeared taken aback by the White House’s announcement, if this comment to a CBS News reporter is any indication.
Just called one of the major tobacco companies to get a comment on the president saying he wants to ban flavored e-cigs.
— Kathryn Watson (@kathrynw5) September 11, 2019
"Oh wow," the media affairs person who picked up the phone said.
But some of Trump’s former aides may use their influence to try to change the president’s mind in the coming weeks, a Politico reporter noted.
Two ex-Trump aides, Josh Raffel and Johnny DeStefano, went to work for Juul after leaving the White House. Wonder if the president will hear from them in the coming days as he moves to ban vaping
— Gabby Orr (@GabbyOrr_) September 11, 2019
Minor correction: the White House does not appear to be trying to ban vaping entirely. The FDA is looking at banning flavored e-cigarettes, which are particularly popular among the industry’s youngest customers.
Trump on Bolton: 'I hope we left on good stead'
Trump has now concluded his Oval Office meeting with reporters, where he announced the planned regulation on e-cigarette companies.
But the president touched on a number of other topics while taking reporters’ questions, including the ouster of his now-former national security adviser, John Bolton.
President Trump says he got along "very well" with John Bolton, but "he made some very big mistakes."
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) September 11, 2019
"He wasn't getting along with people in the administration that I consider very important," he adds https://t.co/Ic1Xe9mmVb pic.twitter.com/xx9VpS8ZGh
“I hope we left on good stead, but maybe we haven’t,” Trump said. Given that the president appeared to fire Bolton by tweet and then Bolton almost immediately contradicted Trump’s version of events in his own tweet, it seems safe to say that they did not leave on “good stead.”
“John wasn’t in line with what we were doing,” the president said in explanation of Bolton’s departure.
But Trump emphasized he would not have trouble filling the job: “We have a lot of good people who want that position. ... We’ll have five people who want it very much.” Trump said he would announce his new national security adviser, his fourth in less than three years, next week.
Updated
It appears e-cigarette companies will have some time to prepare for (and likely lobby against) the proposed ban.
VAPING news: US Health dept chief Alex Azar says it will take several weeks to finish process, then a 30-day effective date—and at that point all flavored e-cigarettes aside from tobacco taken off market.
— Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) September 11, 2019
Producers would have to file for waivers by May 2020.
per @Jordanfabian
Trump noted in his informal announcement of the policy that the first lady has been passionate about the issue. “She’s got a son ... she feels very strongly about it,” the president said of his wife and the son they share, Barron.
Trump is attempting to crack down on e-cigarette products despite the fact that several of his former advisers have gone on to work for Juul, one of the biggest suppliers of e-cigarettes.
As the White House weighs banning flavored vaping products from the market, worth noting that several former WH advisers took jobs at Juul after departing: Josh Raffel, former Jared Kushner aide; John DeStefano, former political adviser; and former Pence aide Rebeccah Propp
— Geoff Bennett (@GeoffRBennett) September 11, 2019
Trump denied he had any involvement with his acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, pressuring the NOAA to back the president’s false hurricane claim, as the New York Times just reported.
.@realDonaldTrump tells reporters he did not instruct his chief of staff to ensure @NOAA disavowed its statements about Alabama and the hurricane
— Jeff Mason (@jeffmason1) September 11, 2019
Trump says Bolton 'wasn't in line' with administration's priorities
Trump is taking questions from reporters in the Oval Office and said he would announce a new national security adviser to replace John Bolton next week.
The president said Bolton “wasn’t in line with what we were doing” and that his hawkish history was unflattering to leaders like Kim Jong-un.
Trump says Bolton was not getting along with people in the administration that are important pic.twitter.com/gqmsWkGtnP
— Jeff Mason (@jeffmason1) September 11, 2019
The health and human services secretary, Alexander Azar, said his department was currently finalizing the guidance on banning flavored e-cigarettes.
NEWS: Trump in Oval says “very, very strong action” may be needed on vaping because it’s a problem for “innocent children.”
— Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) September 11, 2019
FDA planning final guidance to ban flavored vaping, Azar says. https://t.co/QiKjPcxrFU
The first lady, who was present for Trump’s e-cigarette announcement in the Oval Office, tweeted Monday about the “epidemic” of the product’s use among minors.
I am deeply concerned about the growing epidemic of e-cigarette use in our children. We need to do all we can to protect the public from tobacco-related disease and death, and prevent e-cigarettes from becoming an on-ramp to nicotine addiction for a generation of youth. @HHSGov
— Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) September 9, 2019
Trump announces FDA banning flavored e-cigarettes
Trump just announced in an Oval Office meeting with White House reporters that the Food and Drug Administration is banning flavored e-cigarettes.
White House announces FDA is going to take flavored e-cigarettes off the market pic.twitter.com/y689So3cWA
— Jeff Mason (@jeffmason1) September 11, 2019
Michigan became the first state to ban flavored e-cigarettes earlier this month, falling in the footsteps of liberal cities that have done the same.
Jessica Glenza reported a week ago:
Michigan’s Democratic governor Gretchen Whitmer announced the state health department would immediately ban retail and online sales of flavored e-cigarettes through an emergency rule-making process. The move will prohibit the sale, and the misleading marketing, of flavored nicotine vaping products.
‘I’ve got teenagers at home,’ Whitmer said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Wednesday. ‘I was talking with them about the prevalence of vaping in their schools, and it’s everywhere.’
Whitmer said she was concerned about fruit and candy flavored e-cigarettes being marketed to children as healthier alternatives to smoking.
Trump appears to be planning to make an announcement about e-cigarettes any minute at the White House.
.@realDonaldTrump about to make an announcement on e-cigarettes. He could ban the sale of flavored vapes in an attempt to discourage young people from taking up vaping.
— John Roberts (@johnrobertsFox) September 11, 2019
At least three people have died recently as a result of a severe respiratory illness linked to vaping, Jessica Glenza reported last week.
Officials are investigating more than 450 possible cases of a severe breathing illness among otherwise ‘healthy young people’, they said on Friday. Possible cases have been identified across 33 states and one US territory.
Symptoms of the illness include vomiting, nausea, shortness of breath, coughing and chest pain. All confirmed cases appear to have a kind of non-infectious pneumonia, called lipoid pneumonia, developed when oil is inhaled.
In all confirmed cases, patients vaped either nicotine or the marijuana constituent THC in the last 90 days. An estimated 9 million adults and 3.6 million US teenagers vape, including 20% of high school students.
It looks like the president may be preparing to speak to reporters at the White House, so stay tuned.
White House just gathered pool reporters unexpectedly. We don’t know what this is, but expect to hear from the president shortly.
— Eamon Javers (@EamonJavers) September 11, 2019
White House directly involved in pressuring agency to back up Trump's false hurricane claim, report says
White House officials were directly involved with efforts to pressure the NOAA to affirm Trump’s false claim that Hurricane Dorian was threatening Alabama, the New York Times reports.
Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, told Wilbur Ross, the commerce secretary, to have the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration publicly disavow the forecasters’ position that Alabama was not at risk. NOAA, which is part of the Commerce Department, issued an unsigned statement last Friday in response, saying that the Birmingham, Ala., office was wrong to dispute the president’s warning.
In pressing NOAA’s acting administrator to take action, Mr. Ross warned that top employees at the agency could be fired if the situation was not addressed, The New York Times previously reported. Mr. Ross’s spokesman has denied that he threatened to fire anyone, and a senior administration official on Wednesday said Mr. Mulvaney did not tell the commerce secretary to make such a threat.
Quick reminder: this whole controversy stems from an incorrect tweet the president sent more than a week ago. If he had just corrected himself and left it at that, the White House could have avoided all of this bad press. But acknowledging fault isn’t really Trump’s style.
A third former aide to John Bolton has announced she will also leave the National Security Agency. Reuters has more on the departures:
Garrett Marquis, Bolton’s top spokesman, Sarah Tinsley, his communications director, and scheduler Christine Samuelian all resigned in what a source called an amicable fashion.
‘It was an honor to serve my country, and I wish the president and the administration success moving forward,’ Marquis said in a brief statement.
The trio of aides has worked for Bolton for years.
Bolton aides depart the National Security Council
Meanwhile, fallout continues from Trump’s abrupt firing of his national security adviser, John Bolton. (Or did he resign? More on that later.)
At least two of Bolton’s closest aides at the National Security Council have announced they will also leave their roles.
One day after John Bolton was ousted from his role as national security adviser, two of his closest allies on the National Security Council, Sarah Tinsley and Garrett Marquis, have both left their roles, I'm told.
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) September 11, 2019
Trump’s acting chief of staff said yesterday there would not be mass firings at the agency in light of Bolton’s departure, but the former national security adviser’s allies likely see little reason to stick around.
Trump chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, told senior NSC staff yday there would be no mass firings.
— Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) September 11, 2019
NSC aides knew some of Bolton’s aides would depart, however.
Sarah Tinsley, deputy and head of strategic communications, and Garrett Marquis, his spokesman, resigned yday, I’m told. https://t.co/fIs2ZEbwOr
Updated
2020 Democrats share 9/11 memories
Several Democratic presidential candidates have shared statements and remembrances in honor of the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
“I was a sophomore in college when the planes hit. My roommates and I sat transfixed on a futon, glued to the horror unfolding on NBC’s Today Show,” wrote Pete Buttigieg, a veteran who served in Afghanistan.
“Years later, I would find myself carrying an M-4 in Kabul, Afghanistan — the country that had hosted the men who had conceived and implemented unimaginable attacks against other human beings. But in that moment I just sat there, stunned.”
Several other Democratic candidates expressed their gratitude for the first responders and remembered the attacks’ victims.
Today, I’m thinking about the lives we lost on September 11th and the courage of the first responders, service members, and citizens who risked their lives that day and in the aftermath of that tragedy. We will always remember them.
— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) September 11, 2019
We will always remember the lives we lost on 9/11, the first responders who ran towards danger to save others, and those who gave their lives to keep our nation safe. Even amidst one of our darkest moments, our country came together to show the world we won’t be shaken by fear.
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 11, 2019
I was in New York on 9-11 - I remember walking uptown in the crowd trying to call loved ones. Friends and patriots died. Families lost mothers and fathers. It changed us forever. We are still healing. We will never forget. 🙏🇺🇸
— Andrew Yang (@AndrewYang) September 11, 2019
And Bernie Sanders used the anniversary as an opportunity to discuss his foreign policy proposals:
Today, we remember the thousands of lives lost on September 11, 2001, and the bravery of first responders who put their lives at risk to save others.
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) September 11, 2019
The attacks began an era of endless war for our country and we must change course. https://t.co/UcKuln00lg
A New York Times reporter who previously covered the rebuilding of the World Trade Center said back in July, when the president claimed he spent “a lot of time” at Ground Zero, that she recalled only one instance of Trump visiting the site.
So, I covered rebuilding at the WTC for three years after covering the immediate aftermath of the attacks for NYPost. Giuliani was a frequent presence w families, as was Pataki. I recall one instance where Trump was at the site. https://t.co/7Ish98CX1g
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) July 29, 2019
She also drew a distinction between Trump and the first responders who came to the aid of the attacks’ victims:
Being down there surveying the damage is also not the same as standing on that pile of debris, as first responders who got sick did, day after day. I have no memory of Trump talking about first responders or victims' relatives; if it happened, I hope someone can show when it was https://t.co/KMmatufWPW
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) July 29, 2019
Trump repeats dubious claim about visiting Ground Zero
While speaking at the Pentagon’s 9/11 memorial ceremony, the president also repeated his dubious claim that he went down to Ground Zero shortly after the attacks.
Trump recounted how he was watching CNBC when the first plane struck the World Trade Center.
“I was looking out of a window from a building in midtown Manhattan directly at the World Trade Center when I saw the second plane at a tremendous speed go into the second tower,” Trump said. “It was then that I realized the world was going to change.”
He continued: “Soon after I went down to Ground Zero with men who worked for me to try to help in any little way that we could. We were not alone.”
Trump similarly said back in July, while signing a bill to fund the medical care of 9/11 first responders, that he spent “a lot of time” at Ground Zero. But Richard Alles, a retired deputy chief with the New York Fire Department, cast doubt on that.
“I spent many months there myself, and I never witnessed him,” Alles told the New York Times in July. “He was a private citizen at the time. I don’t know what kind of role he could have possibly played.”
Updated
Here is Trump’s full quote on the canceled Taliban peace talks while speaking at the Pentagon’s 9/11 memorial ceremony:
“We had peace talks scheduled a few days ago. I called them off when I learned that they had killed a great American soldier from Puerto Rico and 11 other innocent people. They thought they would use this attack to show strength, but actually what they showed is unrelenting weakness. The last four days, we have hit our enemy harder than they have ever been hit before. And that will continue.
“And if for any reason, they come back to our country, we will go wherever they are, and use power, the likes of which the United States has never used before. And I’m not even talking about nuclear power. They will never have seen anything like what will happen to them. No enemy on earth can match the overwhelming strength skill and might of the American armed forces.”
Trump mentions scrapped Taliban peace talks at Pentagon's 9/11 memorial ceremony
The president has just finished speaking at the Pentagon’s memorial ceremony for the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
It’s safe to say he likely went off the teleprompter a bit. Most notably, Trump invoked his scrapped plans to hold peace talks with the Taliban at Camp David.
“We had peace talks scheduled a few days ago,” Trump told the crowd assembled at one of the sites of the attacks that collectively killed thousands. “I called them off when I learned that they had killed a great American soldier from Puerto Rico and 11 other innocent people ... The last four days we have hit our enemy harder than they have ever been hit before.”
One reporter described the audience’s response as “polite.”
He tried to turn it into a show if his own strength, threatening to hit the enemy harder than ever before. The applause from families and military officials at the 9/11 memorial at the Pentagon could be described as polite. https://t.co/kNKm5200ea
— David Nakamura (@DavidNakamura) September 11, 2019
Joe Biden released a statement in honor of the 9/11 anniversary, saying the event “has become synonymous with America’s iron will to never bend, never break in the face of terror.”
Each 9/11, we remember that resilience and courage live in the hearts of all Americans—especially our brave first responders. 18 years later, we reaffirm that Americans will never bend to terrorism, and we will never forget those we lost.
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) September 11, 2019
“It’s also become a reminder of who we are as a nation and what Americans are capable of when we come together, united in shared purpose,” said the Democratic presidential candidate, who was in the Senate when the attacks occurred.
Biden concluded: “This year, on 9/11, we once more honor the memories of those Americans whose lives were too cruelly cut short, and we renew our commitment to upholding the best of what it means to be an American—and to all that sets the United States apart.”
More on that Washington Post/ABC News poll: Joe Biden has the largest lead over Trump in a hypothetical match-up, besting the president by 15 points.
Bernie Sanders holds a 9-point lead over Trump, and Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris both have 7-point leads. Pete Buttigieg has a more narrow lead over Trump that falls within the poll’s margin of error.
So overall, the poll is good news for Democrats. But pollsters and strategists are historically skeptical of general election polls this far out from Election Day.
In the summer of 2015, Hillary Clinton led Trump by *25* points and the rest of the GOP field by 10-15 points. As late as Feb 2004, Kerry led Bush by 12 points. It’s neither smart nor savvy to base your vote on general election polls a year out. Judge electability with your eyes. pic.twitter.com/DYbWWujS3d
— Adam Jentleson 🎈🐢 (@AJentleson) August 3, 2019
Trump criticizes poll showing him losing to Democratic front-runners
The Fed isn’t the only thing irking the president this morning. More results have been released from the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll, and they show Trump trailing Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris in hypothetical general election match-ups.
....This is a phony suppression poll, meant to build up their Democrat partners. I haven’t even started campaigning yet, and am constantly fighting Fake News like Russia, Russia, Russia. Look at North Carolina last night. Dan Bishop, down big in the Polls, WINS. Easier than 2016!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 11, 2019
This two-part tweet thread continues several falsehoods, not to mention the derogatory nickname he throws in for Warren, so let’s take them one at a time.
First of all, as the blog covered yesterday, the Washington Post/ABC News poll is well regarded. It has an A+ rating from the polling and analysis website FiveThirtyEight.
Second of all, the outlets’ final poll before the general election in 2016 showed that Hillary Clinton would beat Trump nationally by 4 points. That was very close to the actual result, where Clinton defeated Trump in the popular vote by 2 points. (She obviously lost the Electoral College and the presidency along with it.)
Third, there is no evidence that pollsters are skewing their results in an attempt to undermine Trump.
Fourth, Trump has been campaigning since he took office. He has held campaign rallies consistently since his inauguration.
Fifth, Russia’s 2016 election interference is very much confirmed and is not at all “fake news.”
Sixth, Trump has egregiously exaggerated how much Dan Bishop, the Republican who won last night’s special congressional race in North Carolina, was down in the polls.
This is one of the laziest lies Trump has ever told pic.twitter.com/TbNLs1bfAh
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 11, 2019
It’s amazing how many falsehoods can be stuffed into two 280-character tweets.
Trump slams Fed leaders as 'Boneheads'
Good morning, live blog readers — I hope you all take a moment today to remember the 2,997 people lost 18 years ago.
Our president’s focus seems to be drifting toward other topics this morning. While simultaneous celebrating his party’s narrow victory last night in a North Carolina special congressional race, Donald Trump is lashing out against the leaders of the Federal Reserve as “Boneheads.”
....The USA should always be paying the the lowest rate. No Inflation! It is only the naïveté of Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve that doesn’t allow us to do what other countries are already doing. A once in a lifetime opportunity that we are missing because of “Boneheads.”
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 11, 2019
The central bank is expected to once again lower interest rates next week after doing so for the first time in a decade during its July meeting.
But that doesn’t seem to be appeasing Trump, who has previously complained that the Fed’s chairman, Jerome Powell, supposedly raised interest rates too fast and then lowered them too slowly.
This is very well-trodden territory for Trump. He has repeatedly lashed out against Powell to blame the chairman for the slowing US economy, even though the president’s trade war has done far more damage in that arena.
But this poll released yesterday, showing a majority of Americans expect a recession in the next year, is almost certainly on the president’s mind, too. Trump is counting on a strong economy to win re-election. If he doesn’t have it, he’ll at least need a bogeyman to blame for the slump. Why not the Fed chairman?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 11, 2019
Here’s what else the blog is keeping its eye on:
- Americans across the country will recognize the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
- Trump and the first lady are attending a 9/11 observance ceremony at the Pentagon.
- Robert Wilkie, the VA secretary, will continue his five-day trip through Israel.
The blog is watching all of that, so stay tuned.