Clapping is to be replaced with 'jazz hands' at events organised by students in Manchester to make them more accessible to people suffering anxiety disorders.
The traditional loud expression of support - clapping, whooping and cheering - will no longer be encouraged by the University of Manchester Students' Union in a bid to be more inclusive.
Instead, British Sign Language (BSL) clapping, more commonly known as silent jazz hands - where you wave your hands in the air - will be used by attendees of student union meetings.
The motion, which was authored by liberation and access officer Sara Khan, received little opposition from the senate, according to the student newspaper Mancunion.
The National Union of Students (NUS) has been encouraging delegates to refrain from clapping since 2015 - and jazz hands are regularly used instead of applause, whooping and cheering at its events.
The decision has provoked a mixed reaction.
TV presenter Jeremy Vine tweeted a photo of soldiers in World War One and said: "Students will instead use silent 'jazz hands'. Glad some brave young souls decided to ignore the difficulties caused by sudden noises 100 years ago."
Meanwhile, others jumped to the students' union's defence. On Twitter, Adrian Harrop said the online outrage had "saddened" him.
He tweeted: "A student union attempts to be a safer & more inclusive & accessible place for people w/ a wide variety of neurodiverse conditions, who commonly have hypersensitivity to noise. What’s the problem?"
A spokeswoman for the University of Manchester Students’ Union denied reports that clapping had been banned.
Instead she said that jazz hands were being encouraged to make certain meetings more “accessible” to people with anxiety and other issues.
She told The Independent: “The motion was passed to encourage British Sign Language clapping, which is jazz hands, at by no means all meetings, just democratic events, where it is a political event and part of the [students’ union] democratic decision making process.”
“This amounts to a relatively small number of meetings per year," she added.
The spokeswoman said: “We are not banning clapping, because it is unrealistic to think we could police that sort of thing. It’s more ‘encourage’. There are no penalties for people using traditional clapping.”
Adding that she understood that people with anxiety issues were among those the motion was trying to help, she added: “We recognise that sometimes these politically motivated meetings can be potentially hostile to certain groups of people with certain disabilities.
“We are doing one small thing to try to make those events, and therefore the democratic process, more accessible to those groups of people. That’s all.”
