Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Environment
Claudia Cahalane

Social Enterprise Summit: The dangers of relying on just one contract

Meandering Okavango River
Having just income stream from a major customer or contract is dangerous for social enterprises. Photograph: Frans Lanting/© Frans Lanting/Corbis

Mutuals need to steer clear of relying on one contract for all their business and income – that was the warning from delegates and speakers at the Guardian's Social Enterprise Summit today.

In a Q&A session with the panel in the mutual model discussion, delegate James Wise, director of the Social Business Trust, said: "The big problem is that mutuals and spin outs from the public sector might just have one customer. How can they survive when everything is based on one contract?"

Andrew Laird, director of Mutual Ventures, a social enterprise that seeks to empower frontline public service teams, was quick to agree.

"Contracts need to be more diverse. Business development is essential here. Because your income is screwed if you lose that one contract," said Laird.

For further protection, Laird suggested mutuals should not just have one owner, to guard against privatisation.

He said: "It would be hard to privatise John Lewis, all staff shares are in a trust and no one can sell those shares."

Fellow panellist John Goodman, head of policy and regions at Co-operatives UK, highlighted a number of ownership models, including the popular community shares arrangement.

However, Chris Jones, finance director at Welsh Water, who was also on the panel, said that his business had chosen not go down the customer or staff ownership route.

He said he thought getting funding through private capital markets to buy the company, and the process of becoming a social enterprise, would have been much more difficult with hundreds of people involved.

Jones said: "The fact that we can get rates of interest at 2% I think indicates that we have a pretty unique, strong business model. You have to have the right business model for you."

Continuing the discussion, Goodman said he thought that joint ventures, such as those part owned by investors and part owned by employees could be a good idea. "But any more than 30% ownership through venture capital I would be extremely wary of," he warned.

Goodman commented that employee-ownership should not be equated with employee engagement. "They are exclusive concepts ... but success comes where you have both. In America, employee ownership and engagement together creates success."

He said that while the UK's mutual economy was worth £85m, Britain had only dipped its toes in the water compared with a number of other European countries.

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. To join the social enterprise network, click here.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.