For many older Brits, being able to drive is a source of freedom and independence that allows them to take part in everyday life. But to others, these older drivers can sometimes seem like a dangerous nuisance. Should everyone have to sit another driving test when they reach 65?
Many see these mature motorists as a danger to share the road with, as they are more likely to have poor eyesight and slow reaction speeds - but is this unfair?
A 65-year-old motorist could have passed their original driving test in 1974, when drivers were still required to demonstrate knowledge of "arm signals" as well as use of the indicator.
In fact, seing as the written theory test was not introduced until 1996 and hazard perception until 2002, perhaps there are drivers younger than 65 who could benefit from a resit.
More than a third of Brits take this view that older drivers are a danger, perhaps angered by a particularly slow Sunday motorist, but the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents says: "Statistically, older drivers have fewer accidents than other age groups."
Currently, all motorists are asked to renew their licence at the age of 70, and every three years after that, to ensure they meet the eyesight requirements.
What do you think? Should there be an age limit on driving? Let us know down below.
Or, would this limit the freedom and independence of some of our most elderyly drivers? Tell us what you think in the comments.
