Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Science
Guardian readers

Should advanced cancer patients always be given drugs to prolong life?

A coloured scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of dividing breast cancer cells.
A coloured scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of dividing breast cancer cells. Photograph: Steve Gschmeissner/Getty Images/Science Photo Library RM

Surgery and radiotherapy are effective for curing some cancers early on but many patients in the advanced stages are given expensive drugs in the hope of prolonging life. Is too much money spent in researching cancer drugs and too little on surgery, radiotherapy and preventing cancer?

There has been much hype from drug companies, doctors and the media who believe advanced cancer patients should have access to these late stage drugs. Though the NHS foots the bill for patients in the UK, many in the US have spent thousands of dollars on treatments.

Have you or a family member with metastatic cancer be given drugs in the hope of extending life? Do you feel that they should always be given, or was there a cost to quality of life? If you’re a cancer clinician, we’d like to know if you think too much money is spent on research into cancer drugs. Do you believe drug company budgets are skewing research too far in favour of drugs when research is needed in other areas? How do you think this can be changed?

You can share your experiences by filling in our form below. There will be additional questions depending on the option you choose. All responses will be kept confidential and some will be used in our ongoing reporting.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.