Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Tribune News Service
Tribune News Service
National
Dave Goldiner

Sen. Graham storms out of Supreme Court hearing for Jackson

After a stormy dispute over terror detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Sen. Lindsey Graham stormed out of the Senate hearing for Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson.

“I hope they all die in jail if they’re going to go back and kill Americans,” Graham, a South Carolina Republican, said before grabbing a bottle of soda and stalking out. “That’s a better outcome than letting them go.”

Wagging his finger, Graham appeared to lose his temper as he derided the “frickin’ ” Afghanistan government and accused Jackson of being soft on the detainees.

He grilled the trailblazing jurist for filing a brief that raised questions about whether the government had the right to hold accused enemy combatants indefinitely without putting them on trial.

“Advocates to change the system like she was doing would destroy our ability to protect our country,” Graham said.

Jackson kept her cool and refused to give an inch to Graham, calmly correcting him about his interpretation of her positions and noting that her legal responsibility was to represent her clients.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin, D-Ill., also sought to correct the record about Guantanamo. He noted that President Donald Trump also released suspected Taliban prisoners, a point that set off Graham.

Graham voted to confirm Jackson for her current post as an appeals court judge and was considered one of the few Republicans who might consider backing her historic appointment as the first Black female justice.

But he spent most of his question time badgering Jackson about her work as a federal public defender for Guantanamo Bay detainees and even her churchgoing habits.

Graham even grilled her about progressives who supported her nomination over that of his preferred candidate, Judge J. Michelle Childs of his home state of South Carolina.

“The fact that so many of these radical groups that would destroy the law as we know it supported you is problematic to me,” he said.

———

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.