Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Entertainment
Hugh Muir

Secrets of a Police Marksman review – shoot-to-kill from the eye of the sniper

Tony Long in Secrets of a Firearm Officer
The equalizer ... Tony Long in Secrets of a Firearm Officer. Photograph: Production Company/Channel 4

When I think of a marksman, I think of Clint Eastwood as the Man With No Name, but that, it seems, is all wrong. Tony Long, once a renowned firearms officer for the Metropolitan police, was the star of Secrets of a Police Marksman (Channel 4). No hat, no poncho, no chewed cigar. It turns out that real protectors/killers have the bland look of a night manager from Tesco. Certainly Long appears to have found the guise of everyman a useful one in his 25 years as part of an elite group at Scotland Yard, for whom he shot five people, killing three.

This record was open to interpretation. Long, mindful that some officers never fire an operational shot, considered himself unfortunate. On one occasion, he said: “I was halfway through shooting and thought:‘Why is it me again?’” Admirers, however, dubbed him The Equalizer, borrowing (one might guess) from the 1980s TV series starring Edward Woodward as a gun-toting do-gooder.

Long never came across as boastful, but the documentary made clear he was a crack-shot apart. It called him “Britain’s deadliest firearms officer”.

Opening his casebook, Long described his shooting in 1985 of a west-London man, Errol Walker, who had murdered a young woman and was threatening to kill her four-year-old daughter. Long is a man for detail. “I fired a single shot at his head and as I did that his eyes seemed to flip open and roll up into his head.”

Tony Long at a gun range in Prague
Tony Long at a gun range in Prague. Photograph: Production Company/Channel 4

Also described, with grainy footage, testimony and partial reconstruction, was Long’s shooting in 1987 of two men engaged in an armed robbery in south-east London. He fatally shot two of them, hitting both twice. Long recalled his immediate reaction: “I’m thinking ‘You have done it now, you have shot three people’.” Yet the nub of the programme, part of the Secret History series, was his most notorious case, the 2005 cause celébrè shooting of drugs and firearms suspect Azelle Rodney in north London. Though the Crown Prosecution Service declined at the time to prosecute, outraging Rodney’s family, an official inquiry doubted Long’s account. He was prosecuted at the Old Bailey seven years after his retirement.

Long was acquitted, but left “tarnished”. Amid enduring concern over Rodney’s death, and wider accusations of shoot-to kill-policing, this was a platform for a clearly aggrieved Long to restate his case.

It raised important questions. How much armed policing do we need to meet the terrorist threat? Who will carry those guns on our behalf? Might they, because of unconscious bias, be more likely to shoot people of minority backgrounds? Do we accept that mistakes will be made in good faith?

Are we comfortable with Long’s summary of the necessary thought process? “If they pose an immediate threat to you, they cease to be a human being. They are a target. They have to be shot and you shoot them.”

Margaret Thatcher would have admired his directness, and she loomed large in last night’s third instalment of The 80s with Dominic Sandbrook (BBC2). It was another lively romp through a decade which gave us Big Bang, big hair, wide lapels, Del Trotter, mobile phones, acid house and the Iron Lady. She was all business, Sandbrook said, unleashing privatisations on British Telecom and British Gas to bring to an ailing nation the smack of firm management. She unleashed the poll tax, thus initiating the separation between the governing and governed that bedevils us today.

This was social history for those of us of a certain age. We saw the first mobile phone, the first raves, the first Comic Relief, the first British branch of Ikea. But what we saw most was the incongruous, unexplained sight of the amiable Sandbrook in a cavernous deep blue parka coat. Was he chilly throughout? Or was it costume, identifying him as the time-travelling narrator? Worth noting that he didn’t visit the scene of Thatcher’s triumph, the Falklands.

Still, he did reach the satisfying conclusion that Thatcher did not shape the nation as much as she wanted. She hoped privatisations would mould a nation of entrepreneurs; instead people cashed in their shares for profit. She wanted Victorian values; she got riots and ravers high on ecstasy. She was cussed but we were worse.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.