Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
PRESS TRUST OF INDIA

SC notice to Rajasthan House Speaker, 6 MLAs

The Supreme Court on Thursday sought responses from the Rajasthan Assembly Speaker and others on two separate petitions against the merger of six BSP MLAs into the ruling Congress legislature party in the State in September, 2019.

The apex court was hearing separate petitions filed by the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) and BJP MLA Madan Dilawar against the August 24 last year order passed by the Rajasthan High Court.

The High Court had dismissed the BSP’s petition against the September 18, 2019 order passed by the Assembly Speaker approving the merger. It had however given liberty to the BSP to file a disqualification petition with the Speaker raising plea of defection of the six legislators.

The High Court, while dealing with the plea filed by Mr.Dilawar, had asked the Speaker to decide within three months the disqualification petition filed by the BJP MLA against the merger.

‘Boost to Gehlot govt.’

The merger was a boost to Ashok Gehlot-led State government as the tally of the Congress increased to over 100 in the House of 200 MLAs.

The pleas filed by BSP and Dilawar against the High Court’s order came up for hearing on Thursday before a Bench comprising Justices S.A. Nazeer and K.M. Joseph.

“We will issue notice,” the Bench said while seeking responses, including from the Assembly secretary as well as the six MLAs.

Senior advocate Satish Chandra Mishra, appearing for the BSP, referred to the Assembly Speaker’s order and said that nothing would be left to be decided in disqualification proceedings now.

At the outset, the Bench asked Mishra, “Why are you not going before the division bench of the High Court?”.

Mr. Mishra referred to the sequence of events in the matter, including the order passed by the Assembly speaker and the proceedings before the High Court.

In its plea, the BSP has said that the High Court had dismissed its petition holding the September 18, 2019 order passed by the Speaker to be an administrative order and not an order adjudicating the claim of merger under paragraph 4 of the Tenth Schedule.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.