Samoa’s only daily newspaper has been banned from attending press conferences with the Samoan prime minister, in a move that critics say threatens the democratic integrity of the Pacific nation.
Relations between La’aulialemalietoa Leuatea Polataivao Fosi Schmidt and the Samoa Observer have deteriorated in recent weeks, with the prime minister accusing the newspaper of inaccurate reporting during his eight-week medical stay in New Zealand.
The temporary ban was imposed after the public removal of Observer journalist Marieta Heidi Ilalio from the prime minister’s weekly press conference on Monday.
On Monday night, La’aulialemalietoa announced the Samoa Observer would be barred from all future press conferences.
He accused the newspaper of inaccurate reporting while he was in New Zealand for a medical issue and said it had failed to uphold ethical standards.
In a statement, La’aulialemalietoa listed several examples of stories that he claimed were “published without sufficient factual verification or a chance for those involved to respond”.
He cited an editorial which “appeared to be aimed at creating discord during my absence”.
He also detailed an incident on 16 November where he claimed Samoa Observer staff had trespassed at his private residence. “Their approach was rude, arrogant, and invasive and lacked respect for personal privacy.”
After declaring the temporary ban, La’aulialemalietoa said he remained “committed however to a free and vibrant press”.
The Observer responded with an editorial rejecting the prime minister’s claims and reaffirming its commitment to independent, public-interest journalism. It questioned the timing of the ban and said it appeared aimed at suppressing scrutiny rather than correcting inaccuracies.
The Samoa Alliance of Media Practitioners for Development (Sampod) described the ban as a disproportionate and harmful reaction to any concerns about media coverage.
Sampod representative Lilomaiava Maina Vai said the government has clear channels to raise complaints and resolve disputes.
“There are legal avenues and the media council process that can address concerns about reporting,” she said. “Banning and targeting one newspaper is ill advised because it restricts the public’s access to information and undermines the role of the media in a democracy.”
The ban threatens to weaken accountability and risks encouraging hostile actions against journalists, Sampod said. The Pacific Freedom Forum and Journalists Association of Samoa also expressed concerns about the ban and its implications.
TV, radio and online news outlets will continue to cover the prime minister’s briefings.
The former prime minister Fiame Naomi Mata’afa, leader of the opposition Samoa Uniting Party, condemned the ban as a deliberate effort to silence scrutiny.
She said no media outlet was barred during her prime ministership, regardless of whether coverage was critical. “Leadership requires openness, accountability and the ability to face difficult questions.”
Fiame raised concern over the lack of transparency regarding the prime minister’s medical absence and the rise in online hostility targeting the Samoa Observer, which she said risked normalising intimidation.
Former prime minister and leader of the opposition Human Rights Protection Party, Tuilaepa Aiono Sailele Malielegaoi, also criticised the ban.
“This is bad. If you think the information [in an article] is wrong, you will not get sick from it, it is an opportunity to correct it and to expand on the information.”
Marieta said she was taken aback by the directive.
“I have never been asked to leave a press conference before, and for it to be done like that, I had no choice but to stand up and walk away,” she said.
“It made me sad to see how my role as a journalist was undermined at that point.”
The ban has ignited a wider conversation about transparency, leadership accountability and media independence in the country.
The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.
If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.
Secure Messaging in the Guardian app
The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.
If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’.
SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post
If you can safely use the Tor network without being observed or monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.
Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
