Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
Politics
Alex Mitchell

Religious groups at odds over discrimination laws as senate inquiry resumes

The proposed religious discrimination bill is designed to protect those expressing religious beliefs (AAP)

The Australian Christian Lobby maintains it will not support the contentious religious discrimination bill if a clause in a different bill allowing schools to discriminate against same-sex attracted and gender-diverse students is withdrawn.

The lobby's deputy director Dan Flynn said removing section 38.3 of the Sex Discrimination Act was "not something that should be sorted out in a five-minute corridor meeting", and could open up schools to unforeseen risks.

It was reported in December a number of moderate Liberal MPs would support the religious discrimination bill should the Sex Discrimination Act be amended to withdraw that clause.

Section 38.3 allows religious schools to discriminate against another person on the grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity, marital or relationship status or pregnancy.

Mr Flynn told a Senate inquiry examining the new bill that "no gay students" would be disadvantaged if it was passed, but Greens senator Janet Rice said schools already had the ability to discriminate.

"You want to keep that right ... in order to support this bill. It's to keep the right of schools to discriminate against same-sex attracted and gender-diverse students," she said.

Human Rights Law Alliance's John Steenhof tabled a number of case studies including a Christian teacher who was fired in New South Wales for refusing to teach a transgender student.

Senator Rice said Mr Steenhof was implying the "so-called religious right to misgender a child" was worth putting that child's life at risk.

"Are you aware of the level of mental distress, suicidal ideation, actual suicide of transgender and gender-diverse students who are not affirmed in their gender in their schools?" she asked.

"Not just by their classroom teacher, but by the culture of their schools?"

Mr Steenhof accused Senator Rice of trying to make the debate "emotive", adding "I'm happy to trade stories of the deeply emotional people of faith who've been treated horribly and faced deep hostility in the workplace ... which make this bill necessary."

Asked by Labor senator Deborah O'Neill if the reported deal for Liberal MPs Fiona Martin, Dave Sharma, Katie Allen and Angie Bell existed, Mr Flynn said he had written to the attorney-general and was waiting for clarification.

The religious discrimination bill is designed to protect those expressing religious beliefs as long as it isn't done maliciously or in ways that vilify, threaten or intimidate others.

Religious schools and organisations could also preference hiring people of the same faith.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.