Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
Legal Correspondent

Quash defamation case, Kanimozhi urges HC

CHENNAI, 06/12/2011: Aerial view of 150 years of Madras High Court at Chennai. Photo: V. Ganesan (Source: THE HINDU)

Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader M.K. Kanimozhi on Friday took strong exception to a criminal defamation case booked against her for allegedly accusing Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami of encouraging corruption, and urged the Madras High Court to quash the case.

Appearing before Justice N. Sathish Kumar, senior counsel P. Wilson said the defamation case had been filed by a public prosecutor at the instance of the State government for a public speech delivered by Ms. Kanimozhi in Tindivanam on September 18, 2018.

Role as watchdog

Stating that the role of the Opposition was that of a watchdog in a democracy, the counsel wondered how criminal defamation cases could be slapped against Opposition leaders for having discharged their duties as elected representatives of the people.

He said slapping of such cases amounted to stifling the right to freedom of speech and expression. Attacking the prosecution on technical grounds too, he said Ms. Kanimozhi had only used the word “Edappadi” in her speech, though the name of the Chief Minister was K. Palaniswami.

“Edappadi is actually the name of a place. It need not necessarily refer to the Chief Minister. Even a government order issued for launching the prosecution does not mention the name of the Chief Minister. It only says honourable Chief Minister,” the counsel pointed out.

On the other hand, State public prosecutor (SPP) A. Natarajan asked whether the use of the term “Kalaignar” would refer to former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi or not.

“Similarly, even a small child in the State will know that Edappadi refers only to the honourable Chief Minister,” he said.

The SPP also said the petitioner had accused the incumbent AIADMK government of being corrupt and stated that the Chief Minister could be given the title of “corruption king”. This squarely falls within the domain of criminal defamation, he said, opposing the quash petition.

After hearing both, the judge directed the High Court Registry to list the case on December 18 for submitting Supreme Court rulings on the issue.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.