A pub company has been refused permission for two new beer gardens in the east end.
One of the bids, for La Cala in Dennistoun, was opposed by Milnbank Housing Association and nearby residents.
It has now been rejected by Glasgow City Council, alongside a second proposal for The Duke Bar on Duke Street.
City planners ruled Hawthorn Leisure's plans would have a "detrimental impact" on residents in the area.
Both applications requested permission to use outdoor space as beer gardens, which would have opened from 9am until 10pm.
Objections were sent to the council in response to the La Cala application.
The pub is near to Milnbank Housing Association's main office and director Alan Benson raised concerns about "increased noise".
He said: "We are a community-based housing provider and the proposed plan indicates the opening hours for the proposed beer garden will coincide with times our premises are open to members of the public."
A nearby homeowner added: "I have a very young family, including a new-born baby whose bedroom window looks out onto the back of the pub.
"This planned beer garden would cause issues with her sleeping due to excess noise."
He said the pub was "in the heart of a residential area" so should not have an outdoor beer garden "causing noise into the evening".
Another resident said a beer garden would cause "a complete disturbance to the peace in the neighbourhood".
"Increasing the space surrounding a pub has the potential to cause a rise in criminality as there will more likely be excessive drunkenness," she added.
"Please consider the residents in this street and reject this planning proposal."
At The Duke Bar, the council ruled an outdoor seating area would "give rise to unacceptable activity levels likely to have a detrimental impact" on residents.
It added the size and scale of the proposed seating area was "disproportionate" and the plans did not "illustrate that the seating use would be capable of being cleared and stored within the property when not in use".
Both applications had been submitted to the council in December. The applicant could choose to appeal against the decisions, with a request for review needing to be made within three months.
