The right to protest should is just as fundamental as people's rights to worship - and should be treated the same in any future lockdowns, a group of MPs and peers have said.
Laws on the right to protest during the coronavirus pandemic have been a “mess” and campaigners deserve clarity so they can demonstrate safely, The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) has said in a report
It comes after protests in the wake of the murder of Sarah Everard led to ugly scenes between people holding a vigil and police during several gatherings in the last week.
They have called on the Government to place the rights of protest on an equal footing with that of the right to communal worship under lockdown rules.
Committee chairman Harriet Harman said: “The law on the right to protest during the pandemic has been a mess and the right to protest has not been protected.
“While the Government has rightly protected the right to assemble for religion, they have not properly protected the right to protest.
“The right to protests should have no less protection than the right to religious assembly.
“The right to protest is important and should be allowed, like other current exemptions, if it is carried out in a safe way.
“When people have to go to court to establish whether their actions are lawful or criminal, as has happened most recently in the Reclaim These Streets Clapham vigil, it’s clear that the law is in a mess.”
She said the recent events show “clearly how the lack of clarity and level of uncertainty in the law is unacceptable and must be remedied as a matter of urgency.”
In a report, the committee says the Government should amend the law to make it clear protest is permitted if conducted in a manner that reduces public health risks.
The exercise could be carried out “right away”, she said, because the JCHR has drafted regulations.
The committee hit out at the confusing ambiguity of protest laws under lockdown, saying it never has been “completely illegal” during the pandemic.
