Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Daily Record
Daily Record
World
Benedict Tetzlaff-Deas & Peter Diamond

Prince Harry wins court fight against Home Office over personal security plans

Prince Harry has won the latest stage of his High Court fight against the Home Office over his security arrangements. The Duke of Sussex began a legal challenge against the Home Office in February, after it refused to allow him to pay for his own protection while visiting the UK.

The ruling on Friday, July 22, means he will now be able to take the case for a judicial review. He and his team had argued that his US-based entourage do not have sufficient jurisdiction in Britain to be able to protect him properly.

They further argued his hiring of police officers during the duration of his trips would come at no cost to the taxpayer. However, the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec), which falls under the remit of the Home Office, ruled last June that he could no longer be entitled to the “same degree” of security as he is now a private citizen.

The ruling at the High Court on Friday (July 22) means Prince Harry's case will go for judicial review (PA)

Harry’s lawyers said in an appeal last month that the decision had been made with “procedural unfairness” as he had not been able to make “informed representations” before his application was denied. In the first stage of the case earlier this month, the duke’s lawyers asked Mr Justice Swift to grant permission for a full hearing to have a judge review the Home Office’s decision.

In a judgment today, the High Court judge said the case could proceed, granting permission for part of Harry’s claim to have a judicial review. Mr Justice Swift said: “The application for permission to apply for judicial review is allowed in part and refused in part.”

A written argument from Shaeed Fatima QC had earlier stated that the decision had been “materially prejudiced” because “among other things, his offer to pay (for security) was not conveyed to Ravec before the decision was made”.

However, lawyers for the Home Office say Ravec was entitled to reach the decision it did, which is that Harry’s security arrangements will be considered on a “case by case” basis, and argue that permission for a full judicial review should be refused.

Prince Harry enjoyed round-the-clock protection before he left his working role in the Royal Family in 2020 (Getty Images)

Sir James Eadie QC, representing the Home Office, said in written arguments that any tensions between Harry and Royal Household officials are “irrelevant” to his change in status.

According to Mirror Online, the Prince enjoyed round-the-clock protection in the years before he left his working role in the he left working role in the Royal Family in 2020 and moved with his family to the United States.

Don't miss the latest news from around Scotland and beyond - Sign up to our daily newsletter here.

READ NEXT:

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.