Prince Andrew faces being stripped of his titles under a single clause Act of Parliament.
Rachael Maskell, the MP for York Central, is pushing the new law which would remove titles such as Duke from Andrew.
He has been forced to relinquish using them as he faces growing outrage over his alleged sexual abuse of Virginia Giuffre and his relationship with paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Ms Giuffre has alleged that she was forced to have sex with the prince on three occasions, including when she was 17, after being trafficked by Epstein.
Andrew denies the claims.
King Charles III has not pushed for Andrew to be formally stripped of his titles as Buckingham Palace does not want to use up parliamentary time on the matter.
But Ms Maskell, an independent MP having been stripped of the Labour whip for repeatedly rebelling, stressed that a single clause bill could be passed swiftly as a Private Member’s Bill.
Such a move would require the Government allocating time for the legislation, which it is unlikely to do unless with the consent of the King.
But with Andrew set to face spiralling criticism when Ms Giuffre’s posthumous memoir is published this week, Ms Maskell argued that it was “time for Parliament to act,” having previously proposed the law on stripping titles, and she could gain the support from many MPs.
“I do find it incredibly strange that you can give a title but you can’t remove a title. So I do think being able to right history in that way would be an appropriate measure,” she told BBC radio.
“It’s a single clause bill which I’m proposing, so it wouldn’t take up time.
“I really do trust that Parliament will take this seriously and recognize there are opportunities here to address the wrongs of history and to ensure that the voices of victims and survivors are really heard and acted upon.”
The Scottish National Party’s leader at Westminster said there is "no justification" for the UK Government not to bring forward an Act of Parliament to strip Prince Andrew and Lord Mandelson, who was also a friend of Epstein’s, of their titles.
Stephen Flynn said he would "not sit silent" while the family of Ms Giuffre, and the British public, are "angry and aghast".
Plaid Cymru's Westminster leader Liz Saville Roberts said she would back any legislation to strip Prince Andrew of his dukedom.
She said: "Public funds, police protection and royal privilege have long buffered Prince Andrew from the consequences of his actions. And we've paid for all this.
"I will support any efforts to hold royals to the same standards and laws as everyone else - Parliament must have the power to remove privileges from abusers of position."
While Andrew’s titles and honours have been relinquished, meaning he will not use them apart from remaining a Prince, they have not been removed and they remain in existence.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said the royal family had taken “the right course of action” over Prince Andrew but that she did not think they would want to “detract from wider parliamentary business”.
But she also left open the door for backbench MPs to put forward matters for debate in the Commons amid calls from some for Andrew to be officially stripped of his dukedom.
Asked if the Government would give parliamentary time to remove the title, she said: “I don’t think the royal family would want to detract from wider parliamentary business... there are always routes for parliamentarians to put forward debates, to find time for debates if that’s what backbench MPs would wish to do.”
A report in The Sunday Times suggested that the Prince of Wales was “not satisfied” with the decision concerning Andrew’s titles.
The newspaper suggested Prince William intended to take a “more ruthless” approach to his disgraced uncle, and would ban him from his future coronation.
Andrew, still a prince and living in the 30-bedroom Royal Lodge mansion, issued a statement in his own words on Friday in which he said he was giving up using his Duke of York title and honours, to prevent distracting from the work of the monarch and the royal family.
Ms Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, has urged the King to go further and strip Andrew of his right to be a prince.
Charles is said to have acted, in consultation with Prince William, Andrew and the royal family, on Friday, after it emerged Andrew had emailed Epstein in 2011 saying “we’re in this together”, three months after he claimed he had broken all contact with him.
In 2022, the then-Duke of York paid millions to accuser Ms Giuffre to settle a civil sexual assault case, despite claiming never to have met her.
She died by suicide in April, aged 41.
The BBC, which obtained a copy of her book, said that Ms Giuffre says she “was habitually used and humiliated” after being trafficked to “scores of wealthy, powerful people”, and she added: “I believed that I might die a sex slave.”
The prince’s 2019 Newsnight interview, which he hoped would clear his name, backfired when he said he “did not regret” his friendship with convicted paedophile Epstein, who trafficked Ms Giuffre.
The prince was heavily criticised for failing to show sympathy with the sex offender’s victims.
Andrew also said he had “no recollection” of ever meeting Ms Giuffre, and said he could not have had sex with her in March 2001 because he was at Pizza Express with Beatrice on the day in question.
The Metropolitan Police said they would look into claims in the Mail on Sunday that Andrew had passed Ms Giuffre’s date of birth and social security number to his taxpayer-funded bodyguard in 2011 and asked him to investigate her.
A Scotland Yard spokeswoman said: “We are aware of media reporting and are actively looking into the claims made.”
