Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
Special Correspondent

Presence of litigants before family courts not mandatory for filing cases: HC

The High Court of Karnataka on Friday said there was no legal basis for the practice adopted by some family courts in the State insisting on the personal presence of litigants at the time of filing of case.

“Their personal presence is not required when a petition is presented by an advocate as an authorised representative of the petitioner or petitioners... In the same way, when a notice of proceedings filed in the family court is served, on the returnable date the family court cannot insist on the personal presence of the respondent when the respondent enters appearance through a legal practitioner as an authorised agent,” the court said.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice S. Vishwajith Shetty passed the order on a PIL petition, initiated suo motu by the court to find solutions to legal and technical issues in conducting proceedings in trial courts owing to the COVID-19 lockdown restrictions.

“The petitioner can file a petition in the family court through an advocate acting as an authorised agent. The petition can be accompanied by an application seeking permission to be represented by the advocate as an authorised agent,” the court observed, while referring to two earlier judgments on the issue of allowing legal practitioners to represent litigants before family courts.

Presence of complainant

When a written complaint as contemplated by Section 190 (1)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is filed and when the complainant is represented by an advocate, the courts of magistrate cannot insist upon the personal presence of the complainant at the time of filing of complaint.

“In case of a complaint alleging offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, it is not necessary for the magistrates in every case to insist upon the personal presence of the complainant for examining him or her upon oath as contemplated by Section 200 of CrPC, if such a complaint is accompanied by an affidavit from the complainant or an authorised representative,” the court observed.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.