If your pension check rises each year, it’s easy to treat that increase as automatic, like clockwork. Then a notice shows up saying your cost-of-living adjustment changed, or the increase is smaller than expected, and it feels like someone moved the goalposts in secret. That’s where the “pension-benefit surcharge” idea comes from: not always a literal new line item, but a quiet squeeze that leaves retirees with less buying power. In many states, the mechanism isn’t a public referendum at all, it’s a policy change baked into plan rules, funding triggers, or legislation. Understanding how this works helps you plan ahead instead of getting blindsided.
How Reducing COLAs Happens Without a Public Vote
Most public pension COLAs aren’t decided at the ballot box, because they’re usually set in statute or plan provisions that legislatures and pension boards can change. NASRA notes that COLA methods and approvals vary widely across plans, and many designs have shifted in recent years. In practice, that means lawmakers can pass a bill that alters the formula, delays the increase, caps it, or makes it conditional on funding levels. Since 2009, NASRA reports that 33 states reduced, suspended, or eliminated COLAs for at least one public pension plan. This is why reducing COLAs can feel “vote-free,” even when it followed the normal legislative process.
Why States Tweak COLAs in the First Place
COLAs protect retirees from inflation, but they also add long-term cost to pension systems. NASRA explains that COLAs add both value and cost, and plan designs often change based on inflation or the plan’s financial condition. When funding levels drop, states face pressure to stabilize costs without cutting base benefits outright. Some states respond by slowing the growth rate rather than lowering the check today, because it looks less dramatic in the short term. That’s how reducing COLAs becomes the “quiet” lever policymakers pull when budgets tighten.
Two Real-World Examples of COLA Pullbacks
Rhode Island’s retirement changes are a clear illustration of how COLAs can be suspended or limited through legislation and funding triggers. ERSRI explains that Rhode Island’s 2011 retirement law suspended COLAs for many groups until funding thresholds were reached, rather than guaranteeing annual increases regardless of plan health. Washington shows the other side of the coin: its retirement system notes that certain retirees did not receive an increase in 2025 because the required legislation did not pass. A later Washington bill report describes creating an ongoing COLA for certain retirees starting in 2026, again through legislation rather than a public vote. In both cases, reducing COLAs (or restoring them) happens through policy decisions, not a statewide ballot question.
The “Surcharge” Part That Feels Like a Backdoor Cut
Sometimes “surcharge” is shorthand for anything that shrinks your net retirement income without changing the headline pension amount. A smaller COLA can function like a hidden cost because inflation keeps rising while your check rises less, so your purchasing power drops. Some plans also redesign COLAs so they only apply to part of the benefit, cap the maximum increase, or tie it to investment performance and funding status. That structure can feel like a penalty for longevity because the longer you live, the more years you spend with a reduced inflation offset. That’s why reducing COLAs lands emotionally like a surcharge, even if you never see the word on your statement.
What to Check If You Rely on a Pension
Start by finding your plan’s exact COLA language, because “COLA” can mean automatic, conditional, ad hoc, capped, or occasionally suspended. NASRA’s resources emphasize how much variability exists in how plans calculate and approve these increases. Next, look for triggers tied to funded status, inflation measures, or investment returns, because those are the common “switches” that change the outcome. If your plan requires legislative action for an increase, pay attention to whether bills passed or failed, since that can determine whether you get an adjustment at all. Reducing COLAs becomes much less shocking when you treat the COLA as a policy variable rather than a promise.
How to Build a Buffer When Your COLA Shrinks
If your plan’s COLA can drop, build your budget around the lower end of what you might receive, not the best-case year. Create a “price gap” line item that covers the basics most likely to inflate faster, like groceries, utilities, and insurance, and fund it like a monthly bill. Keep a cash buffer for annual spikes, because even a small COLA shortfall feels bigger when property taxes or premiums jump at the same time. If you invest, consider a simple rule that supports withdrawals during high-inflation periods, so you don’t force spending cuts when prices climb. Reducing COLAs hurts most when retirees have no flexible margin, so margin is the practical fix.
Keep Your Retirement Plan Bigger Than the Adjustment
A COLA is important, but it shouldn’t be the only pillar holding up your retirement lifestyle. When you know how your plan’s increase works, you can plan for the years it underperforms and avoid panic decisions. You can also use the knowledge to ask better questions: what triggers changes, who approves them, and what notices you should expect. If you depend heavily on a pension, treat policy shifts as a normal risk category, like market risk or health cost risk. The goal is to stay financially steady even when the system quietly changes the rules.
Have you ever had a pension increase come in lower than you expected, and what step helped you adjust your budget fastest?
What to Read Next…
8 Pension Benefit Traps Boomers in Ohio Still Fall For
10 Signs Retirement Spending Needs a Mid-Quarter Reset
Why Widows Lose Thousands From Pension Confusion After a Spouse Passes
Are You Missing Out on New Deductions That Could Lower Your Retirement Taxes?
These Pension Myths Will Quietly Erode Your Income Over Time
