Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Politics

Parents should only have more children if they can afford it

Two children in dress up measuring their height
‘If you can’t afford to keep them, don’t have them.’ Photograph: Alamy

I was a single parent. Had I not been able to afford to care for and nurture my child, with the help of what was then called family allowance, I would not have had him. I have been a socialist all my adult life, and had welfare support at one time, but I think the two-child cap is more than fair (In the rage over the two-child benefits cap, one fact gets lost: this is state control of women’s bodies, 28 July).

Many countries do not give any benefit for children. The responsibility for their upkeep lies with the parents. If you can’t afford to keep them, don’t have them. To talk of “state control of women’s bodies” is ludicrous. Women, especially in this country, can choose whether to get pregnant or not. Women choose, and if they cannot afford to feed and clothe them, then hardship is their choice. I don’t believe the state should provide for endless children.

Put simply, only have the number of children you can support yourself, be thankful for the benefit you receive for the first two, and think carefully before you produce another mouth to feed.
Eleanor Talbot
Hawarden, Flintshire

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.