Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Evening Standard
Evening Standard
Comment
Daniel Freeman

OPINION - Ulez is a tax on dirty air: we should welcome its extension

The extension of London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone, which comes into force today, will help save lives.

Ulez is a tax on dirty air. The expansion will require a relatively small and declining number of older petrol (pre-2006) and diesel (pre-2015) vehicles to pay a £12.50 daily charge to drive in outer London. Nobody likes paying more taxes, but we should remember that these cars emit nitrogen dioxide and fine particle matter, both of which are linked to heart disease, dementia, and premature death.

There is a genuine argument about the precise rate and impact of Ulez. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to expect those who pollute the most to incur a cost. You might think that the Conservative Party, which claims to champion personal responsibility and market incentives, would back such a scheme. But the reaction from many Conservative politicians has been apoplectic. Susan Hall, the Tory candidate for mayor, hyperbolically claimed the expansion would have a “devastating impact on families and businesses across the city”.

All Londoners, including the poor, will benefit from cleaner air

The Tories have also argued that Ulez will hurt those on lower incomes. This is dubious — car ownership in London is closely linked with income. Households earning over £100,000 are three times more likely to own a car compared with those earning below £10,000. In any case, Conservatives should judge polices based on overall effect and not income. All Londoners, including the poor, will benefit from cleaner air.

Many Conservatives have become suspicious of environmental policies, concerned they are part of some “woke” scheme to abolish capitalism. This is not helped by extreme activities from groups such as XR and Just Stop Oil.

But this need not be the case. Milton Friedman, the Noble-prize winning free market economist, argued that taxes are the best way to deal with pollution from cars as they incentivise consumers to reduce emissions without imposing bans and ever more regulation.

Ultimately, we should be moving towards a full road-pricing system that accounts for the social and environmental costs of driving. Ulez may not be perfect, but it is a step in the right direction towards making the polluter pay.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.