Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
Reuters

Obscure trust links India's top businesses with Modi's election war chest

Behind the doors of a small, nondescript office in the heart of New Delhi lies the headquarters of an electoral trust run by just two men that is the largest-known donor to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), according to a Reuters review of public records.

The Prudent Electoral Trust has raised $272 million since its creation in 2013, funnelling roughly 75% of that to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s party. The trust’s donations to the BJP total 10 times as much as the $20.6 million it issued to the Opposition Congress, the records show.

The previous Congress-led government introduced electoral trusts in 2013 to allow for tax-exempt contribution to parties. It said the mechanism would make campaign financing more transparent by reducing cash contributions, which are harder to trace.

But some election experts say the trusts contribute to opacity around the funding of political parties in the country, where this year’s general election – due to be called within weeks – is expected to return Mr. Modi to power for a rare third term, polls predict.

While Prudent does not disclose how donations made by individual corporate donors are distributed, Reuters used public records from 2018 to 2023 to track flows from some of India’s largest companies.

Eight of India’s biggest business groups donated at least $50 million in total between 2019 and 2023 to the trust, which then issued cheques for corresponding amounts to the BJP, according to the Reuters analysis.

Four companies whose transactions were identified by Reuters — steel giant ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel, telco Bharti Airtel, infrastructure developer GMR and energy giant Essar — have not given money to the party directly and do not appear on its donors’ list.

GMR and Bharti Airtel said in response to Reuters questions that Prudent determines how their donations are distributed.

Prudent decides “as per their internal guidelines, which we are unaware of,” said a GMR spokesman. He added that the company doesn’t “like to align with any political party.”

Bharti Airtel, which created Prudent before transferring control to independent auditors Mukul Goyal and Venkatachalam Ganesh in 2014, said it has “no influence on the decisions, directions and mode of disbursal of funds”.

Spokespeople for the other groups did not respond to calls, text messages and emails.

Mr. Goyal and Mr. Ganesh did not respond to questions sent via email and post. When asked on a brief phone call about how Prudent functioned, Mr. Goyal said, “That is something we do not discuss.”

Prudent — the largest of India’s 18 electoral trusts — is legally required to declare how much it has collected from each donor and the total amounts disbursed to each party.

But it is the only one among India’s four largest electoral trusts to accept contributions from more than one corporate group.

Trusts “provide one layer of separation between firms and parties,” said Milan Vaishnav, an expert on Indian campaign finance at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington-based think-tank.

Political finance in India is widely seen as murky, with most political donationsundisclosed, Mr. Vaishnav added. The BJP said in its latest public disclosure in March 2023 that its political war chest — funds it had available including cash reserves and assets — was valued at ₹70.4 billion ($850 million). That gives it a colossal financial advantage over the Congress, which had ₹7.75 billion in funds.

BJP spokespeople did not respond to repeated requests for comment for this story.

The records show that Prudent was also the largest-known donor to the Congress in the decade to March 2023.

Layer of separation

The Supreme Court said in a February campaign finance ruling that corporate contributions are “purely business transactions made with the intent of securing benefits in return”.

Reuters was unable to establish if political parties know the identities of donors that give through trusts that receive contributions from multiple groups.

M.V. Rajeev Gowda, head of research for the Congress, told Reuters that electoral trusts are a “semi fig-leaf” and that he believed parties knew the donors’ identities. Mr. Gowda, who doesn’t manage the party’s finances, didn’t provide evidence.

The BJP’s next largest known donor is Tata Group’s Progressive Electoral Trust, which has given the party ₹3.6 billion collected from the salt-to-airline conglomerate’s companies. Progressive is also the Congress’s next largest donor, having given it ₹655 million.

Progressive’s by-laws require it to distribute funds proportionate to the number of seats held by each party in Parliament. Prudent has no similar restrictions and Reuters’ analysis of its donations found no such pattern.

Near-instant transfers

Trusts are allowed to retain a maximum of ₹3,00,000 for annual operating expenses. Remaining funds must be disbursed in the fiscal year they were received.

In its analysis of contribution reports filed by Prudent to electoral authorities, Reuters identified 18 transactions between 2019 and 2022 in which the eight corporate groups made large donations to the trust. Within days, Prudent issued cheques for the same amounts to the BJP.

Before the 18 contributions, which are not exhaustive of all the donations made by the groups to Prudent, the trust did not have sufficient funds for the payments to the BJP.

Companies tied to billionaire L.N. Mittal’s ArcelorMittal group were among Prudent’s most prolific donors.

On July 12, 2021, for instance, ArcelorMittal Design and Engineering Centre Private Limited gave Prudent a cheque for ₹500 million ($6.03 million). The next day, Prudent issued a cheque to the BJP for the same amount.

ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India also issued ₹200 million to Prudent on November. 1, 2021, and ₹500 million on November 16, 2022. The respective sums were sent to the BJP on November 5, 2021, and November 17, 2022.

A spokesman for ArcelorMittal did not respond to requests for comment.

Bharti Airtel, meanwhile, issued ₹250 million to Prudent on January 13, 2022 and ₹150 million on March 25, 2021. The trust sent out cheques to the BJP for those amounts on January 14, 2023 and March 25, 2021.

And three companies in the RP-Sanjiv Goenka group — Haldia Energy India, Phillips Carbon Black and Crescent Power — cut cheques for ₹250 million, ₹200 million and ₹50 million on March 15, March 16, and March 19, 2021 respectively. On March 17, the BJP received a ₹450-million-cheque from Prudent; a ₹50-million-cheque followed on March 20.

The RPSG group did not respond to requests for comment.

Donations from Serum Institute and companies in GMR Group, DLF Ltd. and Essar Group moved to the BJP immediately after Prudent received them.

Reuters was unable to identify a similar pattern of funds being sent to the trust and transferred to the Congress immediately afterwards.

However, Reuters found similar patterns involving two regional parties. Megha Engineering and Infrastructure transferred ₹750 million to Prudent across three transactions on July 5 and July 6, 2022. The trust issued a ₹750-million-cheque on July 7 to the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) in Telangana, where Megha group is headquartered.

And property developers Avinash Bhosale Group, based in Maharashtra, gave ₹50 million to Prudent on November 27, 2020. The trust issued a cheque for that amount to the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) on November 30. The corporate groups did not immediately return requests for comment. BRS’s general secretary said he was “not aware” of specifics about the donations, while a senior NCP official said that the party had recently split and “every record will not be available with us”.

Cause of concern?

Public records and party reports show the BJP’s war chest has swelled since Mr. Modi became Prime Minister in 2014, from ₹7.8 billion ($94.09 million) in March 2014 to ₹70.4 billion in March 2023. The Congress’ funds increased from ₹5.38 billion to ₹7.75 billion in the same time period.

The financing gap between the BJP and the Congress is a cause of concern, said Jagdeep Chhokar of Association of Democratic Reforms, a Delhi-based civil society group that was the main petitioner behind the electoral bonds challenge in the Supreme Court.

“Level playing field is an essential part of democracy,” he said.

Some BJP officials have said in the past that the large sums it has raised on its books are an example of its transparency.

The BJP has been the major beneficiary of electoral bonds, a mechanism that allowed donors to give unlimited amounts to parties without public disclosure.

It received some ₹65.66 billion of the ₹120.1 billion worth of such bonds sold between their January 2018 introduction and March 2023. Such bonds made up more than half the contributions received by the BJP in all but one fiscal year since their introduction.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.