Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Business
Peter Preston

No tragedy if Wimbledon is served up by pay TV instead of BBC

Roger Federer at wimbledon
Roger Federer in the mens singles final at Wimbleon. Photograph: Tom Jenkins

‘Flog Wimbledon to pay-TV and you sell off a piece of Britain’s soul”, cries the Daily Mail, curiously warm-hearted because the BBC and the tournament “have gone together like strawberries and cream” for nearly 80 years. So repel prospective BT boarders. Slash Langham Place bureaucracy: or something.

Alas, though, real tennis fans already have to wander the cable byways of ITV and Eurosport to get proper television coverage of the tennis grand slams. Would it make any difference if one more championship crossed the road - except for finals weekend? You can be suitably dismayed about pay-coverage of cricket, football, rugby, and the rest : but the essential game of sporting thrones is long since lost. Would it be a tragedy if Roger Federer couldn’t watch his own matches on BBC1? He could always catch them on Swiss TV, where the licence fee is £305.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.