Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Sun-Times
Comment
Rich Miller

No doubt Madigan created climate for ComEd to shower favors around Springfield | Rich Miller

Illinois House Speaker Michael J. Madigan | AP Photos

A couple of days after the July 17th disclosures in ComEd’s deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. attorney’s office, Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan called individual House Democrats to reassure them that all would be well.

According to multiple legislators, the speaker told his members that he had done nothing wrong and that he never did things like recommend unqualified people for jobs, and fully expected that if they were hired, they would actually show up for work.

One object, I was told, was to prevent more House Democrats from releasing “if true, Madigan must resign” statements.

The gambit failed. By the day he had called, four House Democrats already had said he should resign if the allegations were true. Another, Rep. Anne Stava-Murray, D-Naperville, had gone even further, saying Madigan ought to resign without an “if true” qualifier.

And then not long after the calls, two more House Democrats released “if true” statements, followed that evening by “if true” demands from 12 members of the House Progressive Caucus, eight of whom had not already issued similar statements.

That makes 15. And 74 House Democrats minus 15 equals 59, which is one vote shy of what Madigan will need to be reelected speaker in January, though it’s unclear what will happen that far down the road.

Just two House Democratic men have spoken up. As with the 2018 sexual harassment crisis in his chamber, Madigan once again faces serious problems with women legislators.

Madigan also informed his members that while he was cooperating fully with the feds, he would be fighting these claims because there was no quid pro quo. But fending off the full force and might of a federal prosecutor who appears more hell-bent on prosecuting the speaker than any of his predecessors will not be easy or cheap.

The Friends of Michael J. Madigan campaign committee began earnestly spending money on legal fees in late July of 2017 and has reported spending $2.66 million on lawyers since then. Some of that was spent on investigations that Madigan ordered into his own political operation regarding sexual harassment issues, but not all.

Madigan’s $2.66 million is more than one of every five dollars (21%) expended on legal and attorney fees since late July of 2017 by all state and local candidates and political committees in Illinois combined. Whew.

So I asked a Madigan campaign spokesperson if he would pledge to spend all the money he raises for the rest of this campaign cycle on campaigns and not on legal fees.

“Not going to have a comment,” the spokesperson emailed me back.

Madigan’s most vital job is electing and reelecting House Democrats, many of them suburban women, and that costs lots of money. But so does a vigorous legal defense.

Madigan was super-quick to oust others during the 2018 sexual harassment crisis. For example, Madigan immediately stripped Deputy Majority Leader Lou Lang of his leadership position and his chairmanships after wild and ultimately disproved allegations were leveled against Lang, including a preposterous claim that Lang was involved in a $170 million “bribery” scheme.

Madigan’s actions appeared prudent at the time to many. But now the shoe is on his own foot.

As with the 2018 sexual harassment scandal, there is no doubt that Madigan created this current climate, either by design or by default.

How else can you explain the willingness of ComEd to allegedly hand over a vacant corporate board seat to the man? Why else would ComEd pay millions of dollars to a “consultant” so he could allegedly use that money to put Madigan’s captains (and others) on the payroll who did little to no work? The company’s internship program apparently had a direct pipeline to the 13th Ward, for crying out loud.

These things don’t happen out of thin air. You don’t throw one precious goodie after another at somebody unless you believe it works. And, hey, give Madigan the benefit of the doubt, maybe one thing didn’t specifically lead to another. But you cannot disagree that Madigan allowed that impression to persist.

Madigan ultimately had to admit in 2018 that he’d fostered a hostile climate for women. To his credit, he made things better.

Madigan also created a climate that allowed these ComEd favors to happen, whether he specifically ordered those favors or not. As before, perhaps, he didn’t want to know as long as everything got done.

And, as before, he should admit to this and disavow the practice and change the way things are done or he should seriously consider retirement. It’s time to fully bring Illinois into the 21st Century.

Rich Miller also publishes Capitol Fax, a daily political newsletter, and CapitolFax.com.

Send letters to letters@suntimes.com.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.