Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Tribune News Service
Tribune News Service
Sport
Jonathan M. Alexander

New model could change college football recruiting landscape

The NCAA's Division I Council passed a proposal last week that would better regulate college football recruiting and have major effects on the process.

The proposal, which will go before the NCAA Division I Board of Directors on Wednesday, would add an early signing period in December, allow recruits to take official visits in May of their junior year, and limit the time an FBS coach can participate in camps and clinics to 10 days in June and July. During those camps, which must take place on the school's campus, coaches can have recruiting conversations with prospects participating in the camp.

"It's definitely going to change the landscape of recruiting," said Gunter Brewer, UNC assistant coach and recruiting coordinator.

Brewer said allowing recruits to take visits earlier will likely increase the number of visits recruits take if they have multiple offers and options. The NCAA allows five official visits per athlete.

"I think it's going to add to the budget," he said. "I think it's going to add to the chaos a little bit, but that's the way recruiting is anyway."

As it is now, a college football prospect can only verbally commit to a school in advance of national signing day. Nothing is guaranteed until a player signs a National Letter of Intent in February. Until then, it's a free for all. A school can try to convince a player to decommit from the school they originally committed to, and some coaches can change their minds about players.

Barton Simmons, the director of football scouting for 247sports.com, said the potential changes will likely protect prospective college athletes from the negative instances that occur with recruiting.

"This can protect a player that may be committed to a school for an extended period of time, who then sees his head coach fired, a new coach come in, in January, and the new coach may not want that prospect and sort of drops him and moves onto the next one," Simmons said. "And that prospect is left looking to find another home."

That situation happened to UNC signee CJ Cotman, a 5-11, 180-pound four-star athlete, who originally committed to Tennessee last July.

"My coach called me in and basically told me that they had snapped my offer away," Cotman told Gridiron Now. "They wanted somebody with experience, so they wanted to go get some junior college players."

Having an early signing period for college football has long been a topic of conversation. However, nothing has ever been passed.

The current model restricts high school football players to signing with schools in February on National Signing Day. The proposed model opens the door for an early three-day signing period in December.

Todd Berry, executive director of the American Football Coaches Association, said there is a lot of uncertainty surrounding signing day in knowing who may or may not sign. The AFCA, he said, wanted more transparency for both the coaches and recruits. He said the early signing date provides that.

"If all of a sudden Berry University signs a quarterback in December, then if I'm another quarterback that is interested in Berry University, then that whole month of January before the February signing date I'm going to be able to take visits to places that I know are legitimately interested in me," Berry said, "and I can look and see they'll probably be able to take only one quarterback in the class, because they probably would have signed me in December."

Duke coach David Cutcliffe was vocal about the potential changes on this past February's signing day. He said he didn't really have a problem with a December signing period. He said the average commitment length for his signees were 221 days.

But Cutcliffe said the NCAA should be careful with changes, especially when it comes to recruiting high school students earlier than ever. He said he didn't feel like the current model was broken.

"I've heard that statement," he said. "We're not. We're producing a lot of great young men."

"I spent a lot of time looking at all of this and the thing I can tell you most importantly is that we need to be a little more cautious about trying to change things that sound right. They need to be right."

Efforts to reach Cutcliffe this week were unsuccessful.

If the Division I Board of Governors votes to approve the proposal, most of the recruiting changes will go into effect on Aug. 1.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.