MPs have once again rejected proposals to ban social media access for under-16s, marking the third time such a measure has failed to pass a vote.
The decision came as MPs voted 260 to 161 – a majority of 99 – against an amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill.
This amendment sought to raise the minimum age for accessing social media platforms deemed harmful to 16 within a year.
Education minister Olivia Bailey told the Commons that a comprehensive consultation was necessary before implementing any strategy to address harms linked to social media use.
Despite the rejection of a direct ban, the Bill is set to grant ministers flexible new powers to regulate children’s online activity.
These include the ability to impose curfews, set scrolling limits, and restrict location sharing. Furthermore, the government could also gain the authority to block under-16s from accessing specific social media platforms entirely.
Ms Bailey said: “There is a clear consensus across this House on the need to protect children online.
“But our consultation goes further than these amendments, considering a wider set of options, including risks beyond social media such as gaming and AI chatbots.
“It is not a question of whether the Government acts, but how the Government acts to deliver strong and enduring protections for children online.”
The education minister said the Government will respond to a consultation, which is set to close next month, by the summer, and have made a legislative commitment to report to parliament within six months.
Ms Bailey also said there has been “constructive engagement” from Conservative former minister Lord Nash, who put forward the amendment, and the Government intends to “return to these matters on Monday” in the Lords.
Conservative shadow education secretary Laura Trott said the Government must protect children from extreme and violent content, and parents will “not forgive the continued delay”.
Speaking ahead of the vote, she said: “Twice already, Labour MPs have voted against a ban.
“Parents will be forgiven, for not only feeling deeply let down, but being quite frankly baffled by what is going on.
“They’ve heard the Prime Minister promise action, yet, once again, he’s preparing to lead his party through the lobbies to vote against it. If the Government truly wanted change, they could deliver it today.”
The Government also committed to a statutory ban for phones in schools earlier this week.
Education Committee chairwoman Helen Hayes said: “There will be children who still need to have a phone in school for a whole variety of different reasons, because they are young carers, for example, or because they rely on phone-enabled software to support with a particular disability or special educational need.
“There will be some exceptions, and how that is worked through in the guidance is important for protecting those children from the pressures that might come with being the only child in the classroom who is able to have access to their phone.”
Trump calls Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘low IQ’ in latest slur against person of color
First Labour MP urges PM to resign over vetting ‘psychodrama’: latest
Why did Lord Mandelson fail his vetting for US ambassador role?
Ex-Congressman turned CEO of Trump Media Devin Nunes removed after stock slide
Iran war drives UK inflation up to 3.3% in major blow for Reeves
