Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Daily Mirror
Daily Mirror
National
Zoe Forsey

Meghan Markle 'would have known why Archie didn't get title' and claims are 'misleading'

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry would have known the constitutional reason their son didn't get a HRH title and their claims it was due to the colour of his skin were "misleading", an expert has claimed.

In their interview with Oprah Winfrey, Meghan discussed the decision not to make Archie a prince when he was born in 2019.

She said: "In those months when I was pregnant, we had in tandem the conversations of him not being given security or a title, and also concerns about how dark his skin might be when he’s born.

"They didn't want him to be a prince or princess, not knowing what the gender would be, which would be different from protocol, and that he wasn't going to receive security".

The couple's claims about a royal's comments on Archie's skin colour have shocked (WireImage)

Oprah then asked her: "Who is having that conversation with you?"

Meghan declined to give details of who it was, saying: "I think that would be very damaging to them."

Harry later said it wasn't the Queen or Prince Philip.

Many royal experts have since spoken out to say that it wasn't protocol for Archie to get a tile due to his position in the line of succession, in the same way that Princess Eugenie's son August doesn't have one.

Meghan and Harry spoke about their time in the royal family during an interview with Oprah (HARPO PRODUCTIONS/AFP via Getty)

Speaking on Royalty TV's The Royal Beat, correspondent says the couple would have been well aware of the rules and branded their claims "misleading".

She said: “Meghan would have known [that this was for an established constitutional reason] and Harry would definitely have known.

"I think it was disingenuous to throw all this together and suggest that Archie wasn’t a Prince because of the colour of his skin. I think it was misleading.”

Royal biographer and broadcaster Hugo Vickers added that he didn't understand Meghan's comments on the need to provide security for baby Archie, telling the programme: “I don’t know how many one-year-olds need security because they are normally covered by their parents and Prince Harry had plenty of security at that time.”

Speaking about the Queen's decision to wait a day before releasing her statement, Katie said: "I think she [The Queen] wanted to give it a moment and come back with something that was going to pacify a situation.

She is not brushing it under the carpet, she is extending an olive branch, which I think is very clear in that statement.

‘Recollections may vary’ is frankly something I want on a T-shirt because I think it’s brilliant, it’s like ‘annus horribilis’. It is pure genius!”

  • This week's The Royal Beat is now available on True Royalty TV. To watch the full show visit www.trueroyalty.tv.
Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.