A man with an alleged history of arrests for getting too drunk has won a $5.5million lawsuit against a bar - for serving him too much booze.
A judge ruled in Daniel Rawls' favour after La Fogata Mexican Grill failed to attend the hearing or respond, reports say.
The action was brought following an incident in May 2019, reports the Houston Chronicle.
Rawls claims that he suffered a head injury after brawling with another drunk customer in the parking lot of the Texas restaurant.
But his lawsuit alleged that the wound was the fault of staff - because they allowed both men to drink excessively.
Do you have a view on this story? Let us know in the comments below.

The restaurant was also negligent by not calling an ambulance after Rawls was injured, it was claimed.
Rawls was awarded a total of $5.5million (£4million) for five claims, including premises liability, negligence and damages arising from foreseeable criminal conduct.
The Andrews County 109th District Court ruled in his favour in a default judgment, meaning La Fogata owner Lourdes Galindo did not respond or attend, reports say.
The court did not rule on whether Rawls’ claims were true.
The suit alleged that the bartender in La Fogata - identified as a John and/or Jane Doe - had not been trained well enough to spot if customers were under the influence.
This meant Rawls, from Andrews, and the other man, named as Robert Henrickson, were allowed to get too drunk, it was claimed.
Sign up for our daily newsletter to keep up to date with all the essential information at www.mirror.co.uk/email .
Rawls said he suffered a "serious and debilitating" head injury after he was assaulted by Henrickson and fell over “an uneven parking lot”, according to the suit.
The restaurant has 30 days to file a notice of appeal if they intend to seek a new trial, according to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Rawls is alleged to have has a history of excessive drinking, with jail records showing he was arrested twice on charges of public intoxication.