Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
Special Correspondent

Karnataka HC allows withdrawal of bail petition in which it had made adverse remarks against ACB

The High Court of Karnataka on Thursday dismissed as withdrawn a bail petition, in which a single-judge Bench had recently made several adverse remarks on the functioning of the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) and its head.

The petition was withdrawn by counsel for Mahesh P.S., a deputy tahsildar attached to the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban, and an accused in the alleged bribery case, as a trial court has granted default bail to Mr. Mahesh, as the ACB could not submit the final investigation report within the stipulated period of 60 days.

When the petition came up for hearing before Justice H.P Sandesh, counsel for Mr. Mahesh sought the court’s permission to withdraw the petition, as it did not survive for further consideration before the High Court in view of the default bail.

Mr. Mahesh is accused of demanding a bribe of ₹5 lakh from a landowner on the behalf of J. Manjunath, an IAS officer and then DC, Bengaluru Urban.

Mr. Manjunath was arraigned as an accused and arrested, only after the High Court had questioned why the DC was not made as an accused in the case.

Justice Sandesh, during earlier hearings on the petition, had disclosed that he had received a ‘threat’ and had also summoned the service records of ACB’s head, Additional Director-General of Police Seemant Kumar Singh, besides noting down adverse remarks made against him in his service records.

Subsequently, the Supreme Court, on July 18, stayed the proceedings, which are not linked to the pleadings of the accused deputy tahsildar seeking bail.

The SC passed the interim order in separate appeals filed by the ACB, Mr. Singh, and Mr. Manjunath questioning the HC’s adverse remarks against them.

The Supreme Court prima facie found that HC’s observations were “either irrelevant or detrimental to the fair trial of the accused.”

However, the SC had permitted the judge of the HC to decide the bail petition expeditiously which declining the plea of appellants to shift the hearing of the petition before another judge.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.