Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Canberra Times
The Canberra Times

Judge allows Trump to implement mail-in voting order

A US judge ‌has declined to block President Donald Trump's executive order tightening rules on mail-in voting in a loss for the Democratic Party, whose lawyers ‌argued it could disenfranchise millions of voters.

The decision on Thursday comes as Trump's Republicans are locked in a tight battle to keep control of both houses of the US Congress in the November midterm elections.

Trump has for years pushed the false claim that his 2020 election defeat was the result of widespread voter fraud and has criticised voting by mail.

The executive order signed by ‌Trump on March ‌31 directed his administration ⁠to compile a list of confirmed US citizens eligible to vote in each state ​and to use federal data to help state election officials verify who is eligible to vote.

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticised voting by mail. (Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS)

It also required the US Postal Service to only deliver ballots to voters on each state's approved mail-in ballot list, and required states to preserve election-related records for five years.

In rejecting a request by plaintiffs including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York that he issue ⁠a preliminary injunction blocking the measure, Washington-based US District Judge Carl Nichols ‌wrote that ​the Democrats had brought the case too early because the government had not yet produced any flawed citizenship lists and the Postal ​Service had not yet ‌implemented any new rules.

"Given that the executive order does not command plaintiffs to do anything, and that no agency ​has yet acted pursuant to the Order in a way that could harm plaintiffs, they have not suffered any harm at present," wrote Nichols, who was appointed by Trump during his first term.

The judge said the Democrats could ask ​for ​an injunction again after federal agencies took steps to ​implement the executive order.

Democrats had argued ‌the order infringed on individual states' rights to regulate elections under the US Constitution.

A coalition of Democratic states ​brought a similar lawsuit challenging the executive order in federal court in Boston.

US District Judge Indira Talwani, an appointee ​of Democratic former President Barack Obama, is ⁠due to hear arguments in that case on June 2.

Australian Associated Press

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.