Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

John Floyd questioned about daughter and dating in Fulton County case

John Floyd III, father of Fulton District Attorney Fani Willis, enters the courtroom during a hearing on the Georgia election interference case, Friday, Feb. 16, 2024, in Atlanta. The hearing is to de

In a recent virtual hearing in Fulton County, Mr. John Floyd, father of Fani Willis, was questioned by attorneys on Zoom. The session began with technical difficulties as Mr. Floyd and his counsel struggled to establish visible contact. Despite the initial setback, the proceeding soon resumed, allowing the exchange of questions and answers to take place.

During the hearing, the attorneys asked Mr. Floyd if he had discussed his testimony with his daughter. Mr. Floyd stated that she may have been present when the lawyers were discussing the case, but he could not recall any specific conversation regarding his testimony. When the topic shifted to his daughter's relationship with Mr. Wade, the attorneys inquired if Mr. Floyd was aware of their dating status. Mr. Floyd responded by saying that he was not aware and seemed confused by the question, prompting the attorneys to rephrase it for clarity.

The attorneys persisted, pointing out that if Mr. Wade and his daughter were indeed dating, Mr. Floyd would only have known if his daughter had informed him. In response, Mr. Floyd maintained that he did not know about their relationship. He explained that he had always advised his daughter to carry cash with her on dates as a safety precaution. Mr. Floyd clarified that the advice stemmed from a general notion of being prepared and having a means to leave a situation if needed.

Mr. Kachuroff asks a few quick questions.
Mr. John Floyd, father of Fani Willis, answers questions on a zoom call.

Following Mr. Floyd's testimony, the attorneys concluded their questioning. No additional inquiries were made by either side, indicating that the line of questioning had sufficiently addressed the matter at hand. The hearing proceeded without any further interventions, allowing for a swift conclusion.

It is worth noting that the purpose of Mr. Floyd's testimony and its relevance to the case was not explicitly mentioned in the transcript. The lack of context makes it difficult to ascertain the exact nature of the hearing and the significance of Mr. Floyd's involvement. However, his statements regarding his daughter's relationship and his advice on carrying cash shed light on his perspective and potentially contribute to a broader understanding of the case.

As the hearing concluded, Mr. Cromwell, representing another party, confirmed that he had no further questions for Mr. Floyd. With no other matters to address, the virtual proceedings came to an end, leaving the fate of the case in the hands of the court.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.