Joey Barton has been ordered to pay more than £200,000 of Jeremy Vine’s legal costs after their High Court libel battle.
Vine sued Barton for libel and harassment over several posts on X, formerly Twitter, including one in which he falsely called the BBC Radio 2 presenter a “big bike nonce” and a “pedo defender”.
The pair settled the claim in 2024 after Barton posted two apologies on the same social media platform and paid a total of £110,000 in damages to Vine, as well as his legal costs.
On Tuesday, a specialist costs court heard that Barton had agreed to pay £160,000 of Vine’s costs from the main legal action.
Costs Judge Colum Leonard also ordered Barton to pay a further £43,172.30 arising from the negotiation of the £160,000 figure, meaning he will pay a total of £203,172.30 of Vine’s costs following the legal action.
In an agreed statement read out at the High Court in October 2024, barrister Gervase de Wilde, for Vine, said that the broadcaster “was deeply alarmed, distressed and upset” by Barton’s actions, which included a “persistent and highly damaging campaign of defamation, harassment and misuse of private information”.
Lawyers for Vine told the High Court in May 2024 that Barton’s posts amounted to a “calculated and sustained attack”.
Barton – who played for teams including Manchester City, Newcastle United, Rangers, and French side Marseille during his career – also began using “#bikenonce” on X, which led to it trending on the platform.
After Mrs Justice Steyn ruled that some of the posts could defame Vine, Barton apologised to the journalist in June last year, stating that the allegations he made were “untrue”.
He said that he would pay Vine £75,000 in damages, but solicitors for Vine later said Barton would pay a further £35,000 as part of a “separate settlement” for claims published after legal action began.
Mr De Wilde told the October hearing that Barton made four undertakings as part of the settlement, including not to harass Vine or encourage others to do so.
Vine said following that hearing that Barton “needs to find himself a different hobby”.
The hearing on Tuesday was told that Barton agreed to pay £160,000 of Vine’s legal costs earlier this month, and that Vine was claiming around £60,000 in costs for negotiating that figure.
Suzanne Holmes, for Barton, said this was “excessive” and “disproportionate”, and should be reduced.
Kevin Latham, representing Vine, said Barton had “repeatedly failed to engage in proper negotiation” throughout proceedings and “has to bear the consequences of that approach”.
Neither Barton nor Vine attended the hearing in London.
My court fight to lift superinjunction and expose government’s secret failings
Teacher acquitted of child abuse claims allegations ‘motivated by compensation’
Children to be taught how to resist Andrew Tate ‘incel’ culture at school
Government urged to introduce ‘statutory’ regulations – David Fuller inquiry
King ‘riveted’ by story of Royal Marine boxer who was stabbed
Number of universal credit claimants who don’t need to work soars by 1m in a year
