Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
National
Calla Wahlquist

'It will come to me': Senate puts brave face on farce with four-hour filibuster

Penny Wong
Penny Wong said senators were asked to filibuster until question time at 2pm because the government had not managed to pass any legislation for the Senate to debate. Photograph: Lukas Coch/AAP

In the absence of any actual legislation to debate on Monday, government senators practised their improv.

Officially, the four-hour filibuster was a reply to the speech made by the governor general, Sir Peter Cosgrove, at the opening of parliament.

However the lengthy monologues – on topics ranging from the splendid number of Australian flags visible in the audience shots of the BBC’s Last Night of the Proms, to the surprisingly deep thinking of the Indigenous affairs minister, Nigel Scullion, to the exact name of the Nationals candidate for the lower-house seat of McEwan – bore little reference to Cosgrove’s remarks.

The filibuster was brought on by the government’s failure to have any legislation ready for debate in the Senate. Two bills listed on the notice paper for debate had not passed the lower house when parliament began at 10am.

It followed an embarrassing episode last sitting week when Labor was able to seize control of the lower house after three government MPs went home early.

Filibustering is a grand parliamentary tradition that often provides an opportunity to commend the sterling, yet frequently dull, work of a local to whichever electorate the filibusterer happens to represent.

Unfortunately (and rather surprisingly, given the government would have known ahead of time that it had no actual business to put on the notice paper) government senators appeared to have left their stack of briefing notes on local worthy people at home.

Instead, the Senate was treated to an attempt by the Victorian senator Bridget McKenzie, from the National party, to remember the name of the Nationals candidate for McEwan, James Anderson, or, as McKenzie put it: “In the seat of McEwan we ran … Andrew. Andrew, Andrew … it will come to me.”

“Andrew,” or rather Anderson, McKenzie said, “runs a … stock feeds store, in, ah, in … I’m sorry, madam deputy president, a stock foods store in a place starting with ‘T’.”

The name McKenzie was searching for, Fairfax Media reported, was Tallarook.

McKenzie did recall the name of the Nationals leader in the Senate, Nigel Scullion, at another point in her speech, musing: “He’s a deep thinker. You wouldn’t think it but he actually is.”

Also in the box was the Queensland senator James McGrath, of the Liberal National party, who recorded on Hansard his deep affection for the Last Night of the Proms, which he said was “one of my favourite TV programs, every year, a fantastic music spectacle”.

He continued at length.

“There was no surprise there, it was a fantastic spectacle,” McGrath said.

“And what was great to see that in this huge mass of people at the Royal Albert Hall, that you could see the Australian flag flying proudly – not just once or twice but numerous times – you could see the Australian flag being hoisted aloft by Australians enjoying the best of, of, of, of the British music that is around.”

It wasn’t until the final minutes of the filibuster that Senator Mitch Fifield arrived at the most obvious topic for filibustering: the filibuster itself. It was, as Buzzfeed’s Mark Di Stefano reported, “meta-padding”.

The leader of the Labor party in the Senate, Penny Wong, said senators were asked to filibuster until question time at 2pm because the government had not managed to pass any legislation for the Senate to debate.

The government managed to pass the registration of deaths abroad amendment bill and the primary industries levies and charges collection amendment bill in the early afternoon with crossbench support.

Fifield, the leader of government business in the Senate, blamed the Labor party’s “games” for the delay in the Senate, tweeting: “Senate is ready. No bill could be less controversial.”

Wong, who quoted her favourite bits of the various parliamentary monologues in her own address to the Senate, said the debate “really confirms what Labor said in the election – Mr Turnbull and his government have no agenda”.

“They’ve literally got nothing to talk about,” Wong said.

Australian Associated Press contributed to this report.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.