Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Tribune News Service
Tribune News Service
National
Marie McCullough

It's a boy! Royal baby's arrival highlights debate over risk of home births

Congrats to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry on the birth of their first child, a son!

Prince Harry told reporters on Monday that the early morning birth went well. He said he feels "over the moon," is "so incredibly proud of my wife," and they will soon announce the name of their 7-pound, 3-ounce bairn.

What Prince Harry didn't say was whether the Duchess of Sussex gave birth in a hospital or at their home, Frogmore Cottage. Some media outlets speculated that it was a home birth because the Royal Family's announcement mentioned the couple's home.

Rumors have swirled about Markle's intended birth location, partly because of the ongoing debate over the risks of home births. That debate goes hand-in-hand with angst over the growing trend of women having babies at an "advanced maternal age," meaning over age 35. At 37, Markle is past that threshold.

In the U.S., fewer than 1 percent of births now occur at home, about 30,000 a year, according to federal data. However, home births have been inching up since 2004, and a handful of states _ including Pennsylvania, Montana, and Idaho _ have higher than average rates.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) says women choosing home birth should be informed that, while it involves minimal medical intervention, it has a twofold increased risk of newborn death. The infant is also more likely to suffer seizures or neurological problems than babies born in hospitals.

But one of the studies behind that alarming overview was criticized as flawed when it came out in 2013.

In England, as well as Canada and Denmark, the most recent studies have not found that home births result in worse outcomes than hospital births for low-risk women _ those without complications such as high blood pressure, heart disease, or multiple gestation.

In November, Vanity Fair reported that Markle was considering an in-home birth, in a departure from tradition. Her sister-in-law Kate Middleton, for example, delivered at the Lindo Wing in St. Mary's Hospital.

"Meg wants a natural birth if she can have one. Her mother is very into anything that is holistic and natural ... It's all very much of Meghan's birth plan," Vanity Fair quoted a source.

Whatever that plan entailed, bravo to Markle for taking control. As ACOG says, "Each woman has the right to make a medically informed decision about delivery."

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.