Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Whats Hot
Whats Hot
WH Crew

‘It feels like torture’: Woman rejects WFH job over webcam policy

An Indian woman named Gurleen recently sparked widespread discussion online after revealing why she declined a remote job offer during the interview stage. Her experience has since fueled a larger debate about workplace surveillance, employee privacy, and the evolving realities of work-from-home culture.

According to Gurleen, the interview process initially appeared smooth and promising. However, things changed when the company explained its monitoring policies for the remote role. She claimed that employees would be required to keep their webcams switched on throughout working hours while the company would also take screenshots of their systems every 10 minutes to track productivity.

Sharing her experience in a viral video, Gurleen said the policy immediately made her uncomfortable.

“I recently gave a job interview, and one of their policies is just stuck in my head. It was all going well. There is a work-from-home role in which they wanted to keep track of our work,” she said.

She further explained why the rules felt excessive to her.

“And on top of that, they will take your screenshots of work. Every 10 minutes, bro, I can't even sit still for 10 minutes. And work from home should be flexible. I understand that productivity and tracking efficiency are very important, but like this, it feels more like torture to me,” she added.

The video, captioned “Hiring Humans or Robots!?”, quickly gained traction across social media platforms and prompted thousands of reactions from users with differing opinions.

Many users supported Gurleen’s concerns, arguing that constant monitoring creates unnecessary pressure and anxiety for employees. Several people pointed out that remote work is valued for the trust and flexibility it offers, and excessive surveillance could damage employee morale and mental well-being.

Others, however, defended the company’s approach, saying that monitoring tools have become common in remote work environments. Supporters of such systems argued that organizations need ways to maintain accountability, track productivity, and ensure employees remain engaged while working outside traditional office settings.

The incident has once again highlighted the growing tension between workplace flexibility and corporate oversight in the era of remote work. As companies continue adapting to hybrid and work-from-home models, the conversation around employee privacy and digital surveillance is likely to remain a major topic of debate.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.