Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Digital Camera World
Digital Camera World
Rod Lawton

I'm not sure we should share our photography secrets, and I'll explain why

Photo editing.

I sometimes think there are more photographers on YouTube than there are people to watch them. They’ve all got free advice (well, maybe sponsored, or with ads, or with links to their paid-for preset packs) about how to achieve amazing effects with your camera. This is all great, right? A bottomless resource of expert advice, often extremely good, and given freely. How can I possibly object to this? How can I possibly suggest they shouldn’t tell people their secrets? How mean am I?

But let me ask you a question. Do you think photography is best driven by uniqueness or conformity?

It's a fact that even if you have the best professional camera and the best photo editing software, it's still possible to run out of ideas and inspiration, and where else to look but instagram or YouTube? This is where the algorithms will drive you towards the most popular channels and memes.

How was this dramatic landscape achieved? All I'll say is layers, masks and blend modes. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

Imagine you develop a new technique or approach of your own. You share your process with the world. Soon everyone is copying it. What was once unique is now everywhere. Probably nowhere near as good as when you do it, because process alone can’t replace the original creator’s unique visual skills, but there it is. 

What I’m suggesting is, if you do come up with a striking photographic treatment, don’t tell people how you did it. Let them make up their own special processes! What photography needs is not everyone copying everyone else, but people coming up with their own ideas.

This rich, golden-hour landscape was 'relit' with adjustment layers and masks and intensified with selective HSL adjustments. I'm not giving you any more clues! (Image credit: Rod Lawton)
This is one of my favorite looks. I could explain step by step how it's done, but I promise you can learn so much more by working it out yourself. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

It’s actually quite stimulating to try to ‘reverse engineer’ an effect you admire but you don’t know how it was done, because quite often you discover something new and not really related which is exciting in itself. It encourages people to experiment and learn things for themselves.

And I do think there needs to be an element of ‘magic’ in photography. We shouldn’t always be shown how things are done. It’s a natural human instinct to try to help people by telling them how you achieved a certain effect, but what I’m saying is, don’t do it. Let them guess! Or, if you must, give them some clues to figure it out for themselves.

If you see a photograph or an effect you like, don't ask for step-by-step instructions on how it was done. See if you can work it out for yourself. Is it the lighting, the composition, the editing? All the clues will be in the image.

It seems to me that learning has become a terribly passive process. We’re spoon-fed information and we expect it that way. Active learning is different. It’s where you go out and try stuff and see what happens. We need more of that.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.