Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Business
Miles Brignall

I’m £960 out of pocket for trying to help the Met police

Broken front door … but the cost of the damage caused by the police had to be met by a friend who had simply lent a helping hand.
Broken front door … but the cost of the damage caused by the police had to be met by a friend who had simply lent a helping hand. Photograph: Stock-miester/Alamy Stock Photo/Alamy

Can you help me get my money back – not from a big company but from the Metropolitan police? In March, they called me because a 90-year-old man I try to help was not answering his doorbell. The police had been called because he hadn’t turned up at his book group. They forced their way in and found the man safe in bed, as I had predicted they would.

The PC who was there then asked me to cover the costs of an emergency response team to make safe his front door. I was told I would be reimbursed and would be sent a claim form. Trying to be helpful, and having checked and double-checked with the constable that I would be reimbursed, I duly made a card payment to the emergency response team for £960.

Two months and many phone calls and letters later, and the Met is refusing to reimburse me. My claim has been repeatedly rejected because there was no negligence on behalf of the Met, which acted according to the law. I am not seeking to prove negligence or claiming their behaviour was unlawful – I just want to be reimbursed as I was promised by the PC whose name I took down.

I feel I have been misled and tricked into making this payment under false pretences. The Met said I should take this up with the constable concerned, which is patently absurd.

CS, north London

This has to be one of the more unusual letters sent to us, and our first reaction was this had to be a mistake. However, the correspondence has borne out your story, and the Met is still refusing to reimburse you.

It’s hard not to agree you have been seriously misled by the PC in question, who clearly didn’t know what she was doing. It seems odd that you would even be asked to cover this cost, given that this type of thing must happen all the time.

The Met declined to talk to us about this, claiming it does not comment on individual cases. It confirmed there is no entitlement to compensation in cases where the entry was “lawful and proportionate”. It has now agreed to again contact you directly.

That leaves you understandably frustrated that you have lost £960 on the say-so of a police officer. You may have to get the man to claim on his home insurance, if he has any, or pay you directly. You have told us he is furious about the incident and will be unlikely to cooperate.

The Met police has an appeals procedure, which may be worth exploring. This is a bizarre case that doesn’t reflect well on London’s police service.

We welcome letters but cannot answer individually. Email us at consumer.champions@theguardian.com or write to Consumer Champions, Money, the Guardian, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Please include a daytime phone number. Submission and publication of all letters is subject to terms and conditions

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.