Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
ABC News
ABC News
Environment
By Evan Wasuka

Pacific island wins bid to stop open-pit mine being built on their tiny slice of paradise

A remote community in the Solomon Islands has scored a huge victory against a mining company, which had planned to dig an open-pit mine on their tiny island.

Wagina Island is just 78 square kilometres in size, and residents argued the open-pit bauxite mine the company had been given approval for would affect 60 per cent of the island, damaging land, rivers and the sea.

It's been a seven-year battle for the island's residents, who first took Solomon Bauxite Limited — a company owned by two Hong Kong-listed businesses — to court over its mining plan back in 2014.

The complaint was heard by the country's Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC), which last year revoked the development consent given to the mining company by the Solomon Islands Ministry of Environment.

The committee said the company had failed to follow the law by not getting community consent for its planned mine, and that it failed to provide residents with copies of its environmental impact statement.

That decision was thrown into doubt after Solomon Bauxite Limited appealed, but the country's Minister of Environment has now rejected the appeal.

Wagina Island resident Samao Biribo told the ABC the decision to reject the company's appeal was a huge relief for those living on the island.

"I just wanted to cry because for us, this issue of mining has broken our hearts and made us sad," she said.

"It just makes me want to cry about how hard we fought in court, it's really unfair for us."

An island of refugees

The Wagina Island situation was far from a simple environmental case, as it also involved land rights and the troubled history of colonialism that persists in parts of the Pacific.

Most of the roughly 2,000 people who call Wagina Island home can trace their history back to islands that now make up the Pacific nation of Kiribati — due to drought, they were resettled in Solomon Islands in the late 1950s by the British colonial government, which controlled much of the region.

This was no small move: their home islands in Kiribati were around 3,300 kilometres away from Wagina Island, or around the same distance as the crow flies between Perth and Sydney.

This also wasn't the first time colonial powers had moved the islanders. They had previously been evacuated from other islands in Kiribati two decades earlier in the 1930s, again due to drought.

As a result, the residents of Wagina have a completely different culture to the communities on nearby islands in Solomon Islands.

And while the colonial administration considered Wagina Island to be uninhabited at the time of the resettlement, tribal groups in Solomon Islands have since contested its ownership.

Ms Biribo said the Minister of Environment's decision to reject the appeal has affirmed her people's right to live on the island.

"We stayed here for 50 years. When I received this news it's a beginning for us, it is a recognition of who we are, the Minister recognises us," she said.

"If the Government can continue to recognise us, give us political equality and land rights for us as minority group here."

Case to make waves across the islands

Wagina Island residents used a previously untried provision within the country's environment law to challenge the company's right to mine there.

Lawyer William Kadi from the Public Solicitors Office in the capital Honiara represented the islanders — an undertaking he said proved difficult at times given how far away Wagina Island is, and patchy mobile phone coverage.

He said the case would have major implications beyond Wagina, providing a model for other rural communities who feel powerless against companies with Government-issued mining or logging licences in their area.

"It gives hopes for us to see that there's another alternative avenue … to challenge decisions made by [the] public authority without going to the courts," Mr Kadi said.

Solomon Bauxite Limited still has an existing mining lease on the island, however it will need to re-apply for a new development consent if it wants to attempt to mine on the island again.

The ABC has sought comment from Solomon Bauxite Limited's country representative.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.