Jose Mourinho's facial expressions spoke volumes during Tottenham Hotspur's north London derby defeat against Arsenal.
Despite admitting that he was not happy with his side's first-half performance at the Emirates Stadium, Erik Lamela's stunning rabona effort after 33 minutes to break the deadlock will have improved his mood.
Even if it was ever so slightly. But Martin Odegaard's equaliser a couple of minutes before half-time meant any joy was short-lived.
And Mourinho could not hide his frustration regarding two decisions that went against Tottenham in the second half and ultimately resulted in their fine run of form coming to an end.
The first of which he complained about after the game, both to Sky Sports and to reporters in his post-match press conference as a very debatable decision went against Davinson Sanchez.
The Colombia international dived in on Alexandre Lacazette who missed the ball when attempting an effort on goal, leading to a collision between the two players in the box.
Despite both players appearing to make contact with each other, referee Michael Oliver and VAR official Paul Tierney decided it was an Arsenal spot-kick.
Lacazette would score the resulting penalty to put the hosts 2-1 ahead and leave Spurs chasing an equaliser.
However, all hope of rescuing a point was made all the more difficult when Lamela went from hero to zero as he was sent off for two bookable offences.
The incident that lead to the Argentine's second yellow card happened right in front of Mourinho - and it is safe to say the Spurs boss was far from happy.
As seen in the images above, as soon as Kieran Tierney falls to the ground after being caught by Lamela's elbow, Mourinho throws his hand in the air and then has a frustrated look on his face after the red card was produced.
Furthermore, as Lamela is heading back down the tunnel, there was no eye-contact between player and manager.
Whilst Mourinho did not address the red card in his press conference, he did praise the response of his side once reduced to 10-men.
"And even with 10 players, I think it was proven that our team improved significantly," he said. The second half was our half. And when we made the changes, we made the changes to win the game. Because we felt that the game then was under control.
"In the first half even winning 1-0 we never felt controlling the game, never. In the second half with 1-1 we felt we were controlling the game, and we could give a different step to try to win it.
"Even with 10 players then we were a team, and then we would deserve something."
