Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Politics
Letters

How inaction causes segregation

Old pit head winding gear at Woodhorn mining museum in Northumberland
Old pit head winding gear at Woodhorn mining museum in Northumberland Photograph: MSP Travel Images/Alamy

I’m not sure you can say “There is no state-led segregation policy today” (Editorial, 18 September). Cultural differences have many dimensions, but government inaction and absence of positive policy is a negative force which undermines cohesion. John Harris’s adjacent piece on the left-behind makes the point. Conservative governments seem most willing to ignore or tolerate the real consequences on how we live together.

Margaret Thatcher chose to target what was seen by Conservatives as a belligerent underclass, with Britain’s manufacturing sector exposed to market forces without regard to the consequences for workers or their communities. Remember the wet versus dry arguments in the Tory cabinet? Then look what happened to mining communities such as Ashington or Woodhorn. Since 2010 there have been government arguments that there are too many people on benefits, too many disabled people, too many unemployed, with huge cuts to welfare and local authority budgets.

Add in a housing crisis, combine this with an unfair distribution of government funding towards the shires and away from the industrial centres with the biggest problems – even Arts Council England funding for culture is shown not to be distributed equably – and you increase the negative impacts undermining cohesion. Unsurprisingly, affected communities voted in the referendum against the obvious interests of the Cameron/Osborne-led government, which was hurting them most through austerity.

Even now we have the European Research Group and Patrick Minford wanting, post-Brexit, to unleash more deregulated market forces on societies and communities not ready for any economic battering, and without the wherewithal in their local authorities to sustain services and facilities for quality of life, education, culture and the opportunities for cohesion. Yes, Britain needs to foster egalitarian and representative cultures. But look who is not fostering this.
Roger Tomlinson
Cambridge

• Commenting on the opinion poll finding that four out of 10 adults believe that multiculturalism has undermined British culture, your editorial rejects “arbitrary” (for which read “any”) numerical caps on immigration, and informs us that instead politicians “ought to be preaching the need to learn how to get along with strangers”.

Centre-left politicians across Europe have done so for decades, and the outcome in most of those countries has been the electoral collapse of the centre-left. This is simply a refusal to listen, like Hillary Clinton’s arrogant denunciation of much of the American electorate as “deplorables”.
Christopher Clayton
Chester

• Your editorial on multicultural Britain states that “There is no state-led segregation policy today”. Is not permitting and funding faith schools a form of segregation?
Sue Leyland
Hunmanby, North Yorkshire

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.