Earlier this week, prime minister David Cameron laid out his arguments for airstrikes in Syria, as other parties discuss whether or not to back them.
In a lengthy statement to the Commons on Thursday, Cameron set out the “moral case” for airstrikes against the Islamic State in Syria. He also told MPs there would be no vote in the Commons until there was a clear majority for military action. The Labour party is divided on whether to support airstrikes against Isis, with party leader Jeremy Corbyn and shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn taking very different positions.
We would now like to hear from our readers – do you think we should be pursuing military action against Isis in Syria? Are airstrikes the answer? Or can you suggest an alternative?
Share your thoughts in the form below and we may use your submissions in an article.
