A hiker believes they have found fresh proof of Bigfoot and experts agree that the footprint "clearly isn't a bear".
Sharing the image anonymously, the hiker posted a snap of the imprint on Reddit and said they found it while hiking in California, as the Daily Star reports.
He said he found it at the top of a hike in Big Sur, a mountain range between Carmel and San Simeon, and people believe it could be evidence of a genuine sasquatch.
The image shows a clear and deep foot imprint in some mud, and several people in the forum agreed that the print definitely didn't come from a bear.
What do you think about the sighting? Let us know in the comments...
One Reddit user wrote: "This is the first imprint I have seen that isn't clearly a bear. Good find!
"I wish the print was fresher but this really does look more like a Bigfoot track.
"I don't notice the double step of a bear. It could have been human but I don't notice tread marks or shoe marks."
Another said: "Definitely Sasquatch. The upper foot impression is relative to the lower width and diameter of the depth. I'd reach out to the local BFRSO [Bigfoot Field Researchers Organisation] in your area asap."
"What a solid print," added a third.
However, other Bigfoot enthusiasts weren't as convinced by the original poster's find, arguing that it was probably just a human boot print.
"It’s a booted boot print. Next to a weirdly socked foot," one person joked.
For more of the news you care about, straight to your inbox, sign up for one of our daily newsletters here.
Another wrote: "Looks just like a washed-out boot print."
A third said: "It doesn't look crazy large compared to your foot, at least length-wise, which makes me lean towards human."
But they then backtracked and added: "It is oddly wide though, and there's no tread I can see. The ground doesn't look too conducive for capturing fine details, but you'd still expect some evidence of tread somewhere in the track."
Do you have a story to sell? Get in touch with us at yourmirror@mirror.co.uk
