Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Liverpool Echo
Liverpool Echo
World
Jess Glass & Ryan Paton

Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy head back to High Court for latest round of libel case

The High Court is set to hear the latest round of Rebekah Vardy's libel battle against Coleen Rooney over allegedly leaking stories to the media today.

Mrs Rooney, 35, was dubbed "Wagatha Christie" after she accused Mrs Vardy, 39, of leaking "false stories" about her private life in October 2019 - following a months-long "sting operation".

The wife of former Everton and Manchester United striker Wayne Rooney publicly claimed her fellow footballer's wife shared fake stories she had posted on her personal Instagram account with a national newspaper.

READ MORE: Rebekah Vardy claims partial victory against Coleen Rooney in libel case

Mrs Vardy, who is married to Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy, denies the accusations and is suing Mrs Rooney for libel.

A preliminary hearing will be held today to deal with the timetable of the case and any disputes over the parties' legal costs.

During a previous hearing in March, Mrs Rooney's barrister John Samson asked the court to "reject the claimant's cost budget and ask them to review it because, in the words of my lay client, it is grotesque".

At the time, Mrs Vardy's barrister Sara Mansoori said Mrs Vardy's overall budget was "£897,000, the estimated costs of which are £465,842.

"This compares to Mrs Rooney's estimated costs in her cost budget of £402,312."

However, these estimated costs are likely to have changed after Mrs Vardy applied to have part of Mrs Rooney's defence thrown out.

In a judgment in July, Mrs Justice Steyn threw out parts of Mrs Rooney's defence but kept some aspects that Mrs Vardy had applied to strike out.

This included an allegation that Mrs Vardy was leaking details about the libel case itself to The S*n.

However, Mrs Justice Steyn said the alleged close relationship between Mrs Vardy and the newspaper was "one of the building blocks" of Mrs Rooney's inferential case.

Mrs Vardy's lawyers had argued removing the parts of Mrs Rooney's defence would save £200,000 in Mrs Vardy's legal costs and reduce the length of the trial by three to four days.

However, Mrs Rooney's lawyers previously said the request was a tactical move as parts of the defence would "undermine (Mrs Vardy's) case as well as embarrass her".

The remote hearing on Wednesday is due to start at 2pm.

Want to find out the latest news in your area? Enter your postcode on our In Your Area page here

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.