Summary
- Michael Gove, the justice secretary, has said he wants to see the number of people in prison fall. (See 10.10am.)
- Nicola Sturgeon has pledged to introduce measures to replace money lost by working families in Scotland through the government’s tax credits cuts, but refused to confirm she would top up the full amount of benefits lost. As Severin Carrell reports, the first minister told Holyrood on Thursday she would introduce “real, credible, affordable” plans to mitigate the expected cuts in working families tax credit by the UK government, in a bid to matchScottish Labour’s pledge to restore the lost benefits, made by its leader, Kezia Dugdale, last weekend.Sturgeon’s commitment came after her social justice minister, Alex Neil, was forced to admit on Wednesday that, despite his denials earlier that day, the Scottish government would be able to use Holyrood’s new tax and welfare powers to top up lost tax credits.
- Justine Greening, the international development secretary, has said that Russia’s military intervention in Syria has exacerbated the refugee crisis driving more civilians to flee the country. Speaking to journalists, she said:
If you look at the Russian action that is taking place in northern Syria at the moment and that the most likely flows from that would be north up through Turkey, then there is the real concern of upward pressure on the Syrian refugee crisis more broadly. There is no doubt that the increased military action is putting more pressure on ordinary civilians who have already had four years of military action in Syria.
- The Spectator has hedged its bets by naming David Cameron parliamentarian of the year and Jeremy Corbyn campaigner of the year in its annual awards. And here are the others.
Spectator parliamentarian of the year: surprise, late arrival at the awards ceremony: David Cameron
— Jonathan Freedland (@Freedland) November 5, 2015
Diane Abbott accepts campaigner of the year on behalf of Jeremy Corbyn (while the national anthem plays...)
— James Lyons (@STJamesl) November 5, 2015
This year’s Peer of the Year goes to both Baroness Meacher and Baroness Hollis #SpecParly pic.twitter.com/TmHrW8OF4y
— The Spectator (@spectator) November 5, 2015
This year’s Newcomer of the Year goes to Tommy Shepherd MP #SpecParly pic.twitter.com/nl8UpMG3Vf
— The Spectator (@spectator) November 5, 2015
This year’s Minister of the Year goes to @AmberRudd_MP #SpecParly pic.twitter.com/I4lPKtmXJ3
— The Spectator (@spectator) November 5, 2015
This year’s Insurgent of the Year goes to @RuthDavidsonMSP #SpecParly pic.twitter.com/aXBIGjucTU
— The Spectator (@spectator) November 5, 2015
This year’s Backbencher of the Year goes to Natascha Engel @nengel4ned #SpecParly pic.twitter.com/Y8gp0XF6zD
— The Spectator (@spectator) November 5, 2015
This year’s Lifetime Achievement award goes to @HarrietHarman #SpecParly pic.twitter.com/MudwyaQ3Cn
— The Spectator (@spectator) November 5, 2015
This year's Speech of the Year goes to @JohnnyMercerMP #SpecParly pic.twitter.com/bTA9r29Mud
— The Spectator (@spectator) November 5, 2015
That’s all from me for today.
Thanks for the comments.
Updated
On Twitter a reader points out that Ian Dunt has a good commentary on the House of Lords pornography debate on his Twitter timeline.
Peers debate pornography
I’m back from my stint on the Sharm el-Sheikh blog.
In the House of Lords a debate is underway on the impact of pornography on society. I have not been following it, but luckily colleagues are on the case. Here are some highlights.
Before the debate the House of Lords library produced an eight-page briefing note on the subject (pdf). (But don’t read it in the hope of finding some smut, because you’ll be disappointed.)
The Bishop of Chester
#Porndebate gets off to strong start. Bp of Chester: "Of vices available to me, I've been tempted by most but not in any signif way by porn"
— Pippa Simm (@SimmPippa) November 5, 2015
Bishop of Chester adds that if statistics are to be believed "that makes me a rather unusual, if not exotic, creature" #porndebate
— Pippa Simm (@SimmPippa) November 5, 2015
If something was banned in the Old Testament it meant people were doing it says Bishop of Chester #porndebate
— PARLY (@ParlyApp) November 5, 2015
"I'd like to end in a way which may surprise some members of the house," Bishop Chester says in porn debate
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) November 5, 2015
"I find myself with an unexpected bedfellow in D H Lawrence," he continues. Porn debate is the gift that keeps giving.
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) November 5, 2015
The bishop seems to feel quoting D H Lawrence calling porn the "catastrophe of our time" in 1929 (Great Depression? WW2) helps his argument.
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) November 5, 2015
Bishop of Chester laments in porn debate that we have become a "bundle of unfulfilled appetites"
— Asa Bennett (@asabenn) November 5, 2015
Lord McColl, a Conservative and former doctor
Conservative Lord McColl - a doctor - is up now in the #porndebate, and talking about its medical impact pic.twitter.com/OC4Kz4TtgW
— Asa Bennett (@asabenn) November 5, 2015
"Constant pornography consumption can reduce the size of parts of the brain that are related to reward", Lord McColl tells peers;
— Asa Bennett (@asabenn) November 5, 2015
Lord Giddens, a Labour peer and academic
"Sexuality is being transformed at the same dramatic rate as business...think of Uber," says Lord Giddens. Welp.
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) November 5, 2015
Giddens refers to "complex forms of transgender experimentation". Not sure he wanted that to be as offensive as it risks looking.
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) November 5, 2015
Labour's Lord Giddens says "cybersex has become part and parcel of everyday sexuality". pic.twitter.com/SCJIAMcMWf
— Asa Bennett (@asabenn) November 5, 2015
Bishop of Bristol
"Most sexuality", the Bishop of Bristol tells peers, is "neither watched or undertaken for the camera"
— Asa Bennett (@asabenn) November 5, 2015
Bishop of Bristol: "There are some couples who claim, and I'm not sure I understand this, that pornography has improved their relationships"
— Asa Bennett (@asabenn) November 5, 2015
Lord Farmer, a Conservative
Lord Farmer says discussing impact of porn is a "no go area for polite conversation" during polite HoL conversation pic.twitter.com/hKO2pveS69
— Asa Bennett (@asabenn) November 5, 2015
Lord Farmer is asking for data on injuries from anal sex. "Young people are under considerable pressure to act like porn artists," he warns
— Asa Bennett (@asabenn) November 5, 2015
Lord Cormack, a Conservative
Lord Cormack tells peers pornography "is in the eye of the beholder" pic.twitter.com/c8iEmGSR71
— Asa Bennett (@asabenn) November 5, 2015
Lady Murphy, a crossbencher and former doctor
"If I do go slightly over the top, I do hope colleagues will forgive me," says Baroness Murphy #porndebate
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) November 5, 2015
Murphy on hotel room porn: "Highly enjoyable for those who like watching ordinary heterosexual pornography. It's used by a huge majority"
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) November 5, 2015
Baroness Murphy: "Forgive me for using this language, but pornography is there to aid masturbation" #porndebate
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) November 5, 2015
"Is it surprising that people who aren't having sex at home go away and watch pornography?" asks Baroness Murphy, my new favourite peer.
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) November 5, 2015
Baroness Murphy calls 50 Shades Of Grey "basically a piece of sado-masochism and really rather nasty". pic.twitter.com/ieT6il1mcN
— Jamie Ross (@JamieRoss7) November 5, 2015
The Ukip MEP Patrick O’Flynn is a bit worried by Michael Gove’s prison speech. (See 10.10am.)
I worry Michael Gove is putting in place conditions for a rise in crime. Prison about containment and deterrence as well as rehabilitation.
— Patrick O'Flynn (@oflynnmep) November 5, 2015
I’m off to the lobby briefing now.
And then I will be posting what Number 10 is saying about Sharm el-Sheikh, and covering Patrick McLoughlin’s Commons statement, on the our Sharm el-Sheikh live blog. That means I will not be posting again here until after 1.30pm.
Gove says people who commit crimes may have grown up in 'moral poverty', as well as actual poverty
Conor James McKinney, a legal writer for Full Fact, has been in touch to say that he was also tweeting highlights from Michael Gove’s speech last night. He has some lines that the Howard League (see 10.10am) Here they are.
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: Deprecates binary view of crime as caused by social forces vs carried out by autonomous actors.
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: people who commit crimes make bad choices, but may have grown up in "moral, as well as economic, poverty".
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
- Gove says people who commit crimes may have grown up in “moral poverty”, as well as actual poverty.
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: traces children lacking "self-discipline and self-mastery" through poor educational outcomes to the streets
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: "we need to temper justice with mercy".
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: need to recognise irrational, impulsive decision-making of offenders
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: prisons an opportunity for people to rebuild lives, work, reflect.
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: repeats Churchill line from previous speech about finding the "treasure in the heart of every man".
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: talks about meeting prison officer at Strangeways who wanted to change people's lives.
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: more needs to be done on the care system. Children in it need affection or risk being exploited/offending.
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
Gove speech @TheHowardLeague: speaks of increasing respect for social work profession. Audience again registers approving surprise, claps.
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 4, 2015
UPDATE: After I posted a tweet about this last point, Conor James McKinney sent me a clarification.
@AndrewSparrow Should clarify, on "increasing respect for social workers" it was his respect for them he said had increased while in office.
— Conor James McKinney (@mckinneytweets) November 5, 2015
Updated
The Resolution Foundation released some details of its analysis last night about George Osborne could afford to abandon his planned tax credit cuts. But that the event this morning (where Frank Field was speaking) it has produced further figures to boost its case.
Here are some of the key charts from its presentation.
- The Resolution Foundation said that having a higher minimum wage and bringing forward the planned personal tax allowance increase would not make much difference. It has estimated that, under Osborne’s original plans, 3.3m families would lose £1,300 each next year. Even with a higher “national living wage” and the £12,500 tax allowance coming in in 2016 (at a cost to the Treaury of £9bn), instead of by 2020 as planned, families on tax credits would still lose £900 on average.
How much difference do tax cuts & the national living wage make to #taxcredits losses in 2016 and 2020? Not enough pic.twitter.com/9gijMN1ZAN
— ResolutionFoundation (@resfoundation) November 5, 2015
- It says the impact of the tax credit cuts are very regressive. This chart shows who benefits from the “national living wage” and tax cuts (all income groups, roughly equally - the light brown bars on the chart) and how loses from the tax credit changes (the poor - the dark and light blue bars on the chart).
But tax credit losses are concentrated, producing v regressive outcome #taxcredits pic.twitter.com/LBx9i4FWxm
— Matthew Whittaker (@MattWhittakerRF) November 5, 2015
- It says the government’s plans to increase the tax allowance to £12,00 and the higher rate tax threshold to £50,000 are highly regressive.
A reminder of just how regressive the government's tax cut plans are. £6.2bn with 4/5 going to top half #taxcredits pic.twitter.com/ArMVQqvz2T
— Matthew Whittaker (@MattWhittakerRF) November 5, 2015
Frank Field tells George Osborne how he should reform tax credits
Frank Field, the Labour chair of the Commons work and pensions committee, has been speaking at a Resolution Foundation event this morning. It is the one where the thinktank is presenting new research explaining how the Treasury could afford to abandon its plans to cut tax credits. In his speech, Field said George Osborne should use the tax credits debacle as an opportunity for serious tax credits reform.
Here are the key points.
- Field criticised the Treasury for refusing to release proper information about the impact of the proposed tax credit cuts.
The Treasury appears to be operating a policy of non-cooperation. Every attempt to gain information, every parliamentary question tabled, is batted back with the same tired old response that the answer could only be gained at ‘disproportionate cost’.
One example is the numbers of low earners who roll on and off tax credits each year. The Centre for Social Justice, who have contributed their own proposals to protect low earners as well as their own welfare reform creation, universal credit, say that by 2020 only 9 per cent of people currently on tax credits will still have a live tax credit claim.
But the Treasury’s policy of non-cooperation means we cannot say with any certainty how many of today’s tax credit claimants will either have migrated to universal credit or floated off in-work benefits by earning higher wages.
- He said that Osborne should avoid trying to mitigate the impact of the tax credit cuts by increasing the tax allowance or the national insurance threshold.
The chancellor must resist the urge to shower any new money on the whole working population. Any moves to increase the personal allowance, or increase the national insurance threshold, whilst welcome in themselves as part of a general budget strategy, would not compensate the 3.2m low earners who stand to lose out from his current tax credit reforms. Their losses would largely remain undiminished by changing the thresholds.
The only way the chancellor will be able to protect those children in families who currently stand to lose out is by changing his proposals to reform the tax credit system itself.
- Field said that, having been forced to conduct a rethink on tax credits, Osborne should take the opportunity to introduce “serious tax credits reform”.
The unholy tax credit muddle offers the chancellor the possibility of becoming a serious welfare reformer.
The muddle the chancellor is in results from his starting point of aiming simply to save £4.4bn. The inability of the chancellor to get his tax credit cuts through the House of Lords allows him to ask a different question: ‘How do I transform the role of tax credits from one that was a general subsidy to low wages to one that will become a benefit to poorer children, underpinned by a national living wage strategy?’
- He said Osborne should transform tax credits into a benefit intended to help low-paid people for children. Tax credits for workers without children should be phased out by 2020, Field said, although he said that there might have to be some “transitional protection” after that date for people unable to increase the number of hours they work. By 2020 the “national living wage” should be £9 an hour, he said, and this should be the key measure helping this group. Instead tax credits should be focused on those with children, he said.
This move is no silver bullet, but it would kick-start a wider reform programme by bringing tax credits back to their original conception. This was to ensure that the money earned by individuals with children, together with child benefit and the tax credits, would afford them a higher standard of living than the childless, and those out of work and dependent on benefits.
- He said that jobcentre staff should actively help claimants focus on increasing their earnings. And, to give them an incentive, people should be able to increase their earnings by up to £5,000 over 18 months without losing tax credit, he said.
Both for the childless, and for tax credit claimants with children, the Department for Work and Pensions should build up the capacity to offer tax credit claimants the first of what might become a whole series of job coaching support exercises.
Claimants enrolling on this pay progression scheme would be invited into Jobcentre Plus to discuss how they might increase their earnings over the next few years.
It would be in the interest of all claimants to engage fully and therefore the interviews need not be made mandatory.
At these interviews Jobcentre Plus staff should offer a package of support so that individuals can begin to transform what they earn. For some this may be difficult at the current time, and for others it may be impossible, but all working tax credit recipients should be offered the same deal.
The aim would be for Jobcentre Plus staff to work with claimants to find new job opportunities paying higher wages, or to negotiate with existing employers to be able to work longer hours in the same firm.
The incentives should be clear; raising claimants’ pay by up to £5,000 within any 18 month period should be free of any loss in tax credit entitlements. The chancellor should therefore extend the time over which this ‘income disregard’ would count and reverse the decision to halve this disregard to £2,500.
Updated
Michael Gove's prison speech - Highlights
The Ministry of Justice has not got a text of Michael Gove’s speech. He was speaking off the cuff, although a transcript may be available later.
But the Howard League posted the highlights on Twitter. Here they are.
Standing room only as Michael Gove speaks to the Howard League.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: We are entering a new era of talking about crime and punishment and rehabilitation.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: When we look at those who find themselves in prison, there's a huge spectrum.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: Trio of things custody is supposed to instil - to incapacitate, to deter, to rehabilitate - not equally important.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Rehabilitation is most important.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
- Gove says rehabilitation is the most important task for prisons. He suggests that role is even more important than the part prisons play in protecting the public.
Gove: Prison officers, teachers, chaplains all choose to work there because they see opportunities for change.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: "We need to make sure that those drawn towards working with offenders... have an opportunity to make a difference."
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: "If we give governors more say... the space to work with housing providers, charities... I think we can achieve significant gains."
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
- Gove confirms he wants to give prison governors more operational freedom.
Gove: if Govt and HL work together, I think there's a possibility for us to transcend the old divisions that used to bedevil this debate.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
HL is the Howard League.
Gove: I would like to see the prison population fall over time.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
- Gove says he wants to see prison numbers fall.
Gove: Everyone in this room knows there are big problems in prisons. Violence, self-harm, dangers faced by staff all hugely concerning.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: We can move first of all towards closing Victorian prisons that are insanitary and have overcrowding problems. We'll build new ones.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
- Gove says he wants to close insanitary Victorian prisons.
Gove: Need to think about providing opportunities for use of technology to help us - eg. prison officers wearing cameras.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
- Gove says he would like to see more prisoners using body cameras.
Gove asked by a member if he would be allowed to take a journalist into a prison. Gove says yes.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
- Gove says he is willing to let journalists visit prisons. This will please my colleague Amelia Gentleman, who spent ages trying and failing to get the Ministry of Justice to authorise a prison visit under the Chris Grayling regime. In a good piece about this, she said it was easier getting permission to visit a prison in Russia.
Gove: Short sentences is an issue that we need to have a look at. I want more data and detail.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: Harris Review makes a number of recommendations. Important to consider them along with other work that's going on (eg Charlie Taylor).
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
The Harris review said understaffing in prisons was contributing to suicide levels.
Gove: Legal aid has taken some big cuts. We have now paused that process.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: It's often the case that those children who suffer abuse and neglect don't receive the affection that we would give our own children.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: Many of those who teach in prison are employees of FE colleges. I'm anxious to look again at which BIS funds prisoner education.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Gove: I'd like to make prison governors more accountable for educational output. But I will wait for Sally Coates's recommendations.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
Dame Sally Coates is conducting a review of education in prisons.
That concludes the Q&A and the public meeting. We've given Mr Gove a parting gift to say thank you - a book of John Howard's journals.
— The Howard League (@TheHowardLeague) November 4, 2015
John Howard was an eighteenth century prison reformer after whom the Howard League was named.
But Michael Gove doesn't reveal how prison population would be cut but says he needs to look at short-sentence prisoners @TheHowardLeague
— Danny Shaw (@DannyShawBBC) November 4, 2015
Michael Gove woos the 400-strong audience by praising social workers & warmly accepting gift of John Howard's journals @TheHowardLeague
— Danny Shaw (@DannyShawBBC) November 4, 2015
Refreshing words from the Secretary of State for Justice Michael Gove MP, speaking at tonights @TheHowardLeague AGM pic.twitter.com/MVPC8lGIbE
— Prison image (@prisonimage) November 4, 2015
When Michael Gove gave evidence to the Commons justice committee in July for the first time as justice secretary, he was specifically asked if he wanted to see more people in jail, or fewer people in jail. He ducked the question, saying that it was up to the courts to decide what sentences they handed out.
Last night, speaking to the Howard League for Penal Reform, Gove gave a different answer. He said that, over time, he did want the prison population to fall.
What has changed? Well, for a start he has had more time to think about his approach to the job. When he gave evidence to the justice committee in July, it was clear that he was still feeling his way into his new brief.
But since July we’ve also had a clear indication from David Cameron that he rejects the ‘lock ‘em up and throw away the key’ approach to penal policy beloved of many traditional Conservatives. In his conference speech Cameron devoted a large section to the need for penal reform, and he explicitly acknowledged the limitations of jail. He told the Tories:
There’s another service run by the state that all too often fails and entrenches poverty.
Prison.
At Westminster attention is focused his morning on the Egyptian president, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi’s, visit to Downing Street, and the repercussions of the government’s surprise decision to suspend British flights to and from Sharm el-Sheikh because it believes a bomb may have caused the crash of a Russian plane that left the airport on Saturday. But we’ve got a separate live blog focusing exclusively on that story, and so I will be leaving that to my colleague Matthew Weaver.
Otherwise the most interesting story to emerge overnight comes from Michael Gove, the justice secretary, who told the Howard League for Penal Reform last night that he wanted to cut the number of people in jail in England and Wales. He said:
Obviously I’d like to see the prison population fall over time. I believe the best way we can do that is by dealing effectively with those offenders who are in our care at the moment, through effective rehabilitation.
I’ll cover more from the speech, and the reaction to it, as the morning goes on.
Here is the agenda for the day.
10.30am: Frank Field, the Labour chair of the work and pensions committee, speaks at a Resolution Foundation event where the thinktank is publishing a report on five alternative measures George Osborne could take that would allow him to abandon his planned tax credit cuts.
Around 11.30am: Patrick McLoughlin, the transport secretary, is expected to make a statement in the Commons about Sharm el-Sheikh.
Around 12.30pm: The Spectator holds his parliamentarian of the year awards.
12.45pm: Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England, holds a press conference as the Bank publishes its quarterly inflation report. My colleague Graeme Wearden is covering this on his business live blog.
As usual, I will also be covering breaking political news as it happens, as well as bringing you the best reaction, comment and analysis from the web. I will post a summary at lunchtime and another in the afternoon.
If you want to follow me or contact me on Twitter, I’m on@AndrewSparrow.