Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Bloomberg
Bloomberg
Business
Catherine Bosley

Future of Swiss Banking Hangs in Balance as Voters Head to Polls

The Swiss are about to decide on the future of their banking system.

Up for a national vote on Sunday is a measure that would upend the way financial institutions do business by forbidding banks from “creating” money through lending. That’s something that’s been a key tenet of finance for centuries, but one that some have questioned given the industry’s role in the global crisis a decade ago.

The “Vollgeld” proposal, opposed by the government and the Swiss National Bank, is unlikely to pass, according to polls. But its very existence shows how -- even after global regulators piled multiple tougher restrictions on banks -- there’s lingering resentment and lack of trust in the financial industry.

Negative views aren’t just due to the economic downturn whose legacy is still being felt. There were also bailouts for banks -- including Switzerland’s own UBS in 2008 -- as well as scandals surrounding rogue behavior, benchmark rigging and bribery that led to billions of dollars in fines.

The Swiss referendum has its roots in the country’s direct democracy system, where 100,000 signatures gets you a national ballot. There are usually multiple such votes a year.

Under Vollgeld, the SNB would be the only entity allowed to create money and consumers’ checking accounts would have to be fully backed by central bank-issued cash.

Supporters argue it would rein in asset price bubbles by putting the central bank solely in charge of the amount of money in the economy, though analysts at UniCredit, who’ve dubbed it an “extreme” proposal, dispute its effectiveness in this regard.

SNB President Thomas Jordan has come out against the initiative in a media blitz of interviews and speeches, warning it would impinge upon his institution’s independence. The Swiss Bankers Association says it puts jobs, tax revenues and the country’s prosperity at risk.

“There’s no clear evidence it would reduce booms and busts in credit cycles,” said Daniel Vernazza of UniCredit in London. “If you look at the global financial crisis, it wouldn’t have helped in that situation, where the origin was from abroad and in investment banking.”

--With assistance from Hayley Warren.

To contact the reporter on this story: Catherine Bosley in Zurich at cbosley1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Fergal O'Brien at fobrien@bloomberg.net, Zoe Schneeweiss

©2018 Bloomberg L.P.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.