The Commons vote in favour of broadcasting on sound radio the proceedings of Parliament for a trial period is a cautious, even timid, step in the right direction. It’s a pity that a majority of MPs could not steel themselves to experiment with television as well; but this is bound to come, especially as less disruptive lighting is now available.
The dangers of biased editing, and of MPs displaying their theatrical talents to impress televiewers are real, but exaggerated. The BBC and ITN have both shown the highest skill and objectivity in reporting Parliament, especially in the BBC’s Today in Parliament. Dead-pan editing can be left safely in their hands.
The real danger of broadcasting or televising Parliament may not be bias but boredom. The risk is of confirming the public feeling that Parliament is a politicians’ talking shop remote from everyday concerns. The key committees in which much of the serious business is done must not be overlooked. But an explanatory commentator may be essential if the public is to understand.
Key quote
“Unemployment is not the alternative to bringing down the rate of inflation: it is the consequence of failing to do so.”
Chancellor of the Exchequer, Denis Healey
Talking point
Mr Michael Foot’s Trade Union and Labour Relations (Amendment) Bill has been attacked by editors and many others as a threat to the freedom of the press. They argue that an editorial closed shop in the media would give the National Union of Journalists the power to decide who should have access to newspapers and broadcasting, and that the bill should be amended to meet this potential threat to the public’s right to a press free from internal trade union fetters.
Barrister Michael Beloff on restrictive practices in Fleet Street
