In a recent interview, a former Army Special Forces commander has expressed his concerns about the recent retaliatory strikes conducted by the United States and the potential implications of such actions. After the loss of three American lives, the strikes were conducted as a response, but the former commander believes that the approach taken may not lead to the desired outcome.
The former commander highlights the fact that the strikes, while they may seem significant with 125 munitions involved, are relatively small-scale compared to previous operations. In 2017 alone, over 30,000 bombs were dropped in Iraq and Syria, with 5,000 being deployed in a single month. The targets of the recent strikes, such as the Abu Kamal and Al-Qa'im complexes, are known to have absorbed numerous bombings in the past without any tangible impact.
Furthermore, the former commander questions whether such limited strikes serve to deter Iran or send a strong message. While they may appear imposing to a Western audience, the true commanders on the Iranian side, particularly the Quds Force cadres, were given ample time to vacate the premises. This, coupled with the difficulty of targeting elusive individuals and the preparation required, raises doubts about the effectiveness of the strikes as a deterrent.
The former commander also raises concerns about the safety of American troops stationed in remote bases, particularly in Iraq and Syria. With the absence of sophisticated air defenses in such locations, there is the possibility of drone attacks orchestrated by Iran. The interviewee points out that even the largest base in the region, Al-Assad, which launched 12 Patriot missiles to intercept incoming threats, was not entirely successful in defending itself. This raises doubts about the security of remote sites and the vulnerability of the troops stationed there.
The interview highlights the need for a comprehensive approach that goes beyond limited strikes to truly restore deterrence. It calls for a more proactive stance, where offense becomes the defensive weapon. However, the former commander also notes that current restrictions may prevent troops from taking such actions and therefore leaving them exposed.
In conclusion, the former commander's concerns about the recent retaliatory strikes and their potential implications ring alarm bells regarding the efficacy of this approach. Without a comprehensive strategy and proactive measures, there is a fear that the escalation of tensions between the United States and Iran may continue, putting American troops at risk.
