Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Evening Standard
Evening Standard
Politics
Helen Corbett

Foreign Office boss sacked by Starmer submits legal challenge

Sir Olly Robbins is requesting a judicial review after he was removed as the top civil servant at the Foreign Office (Dominic Lipinski/PA) - (PA Wire)

The former Foreign Office chief sacked by Sir Keir Starmer over Lord Peter Mandelson’s security vetting has submitted a legal challenge over his dismissal.

Sir Olly Robbins is requesting a judicial review after he was removed as the top civil servant at the Foreign Office, the FDA Union representing him said in a statement.

His submission makes the case that Sir Keir has no statutory authority to dismiss him as the head of the diplomatic service, and that there was “no fair procedure” and “no process at all” in the dismissal.

It also says Sir Olly was given “irrational” reasons for being fired.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (R) and then British ambassador to the United States Lord Peter Mandelson (Carl Court/PA) (PA Archive)
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (R) and then British ambassador to the United States Lord Peter Mandelson (Carl Court/PA) (PA Archive)

In April this year, questions were raised over the vetting of Lord Mandelson for his post as ambassador to the US after The Guardian reported he had failed a background check, but that officials in the Foreign Office took the rare step of overruling this to clear his appointment anyway.

Sir Keir then sacked Sir Olly, saying he had not been aware the former Labour grandee was granted developed vetting against the advice of UK Security Vetting.

The FDA said that the sacking was based on a “grievous misunderstanding” of how vetting works.

“Rather than being under a duty to tell ministers about the process leading up to the vetting decision, Olly was under an obligation not to.

“The process is independent of government ministers, who are only informed of the final outcome,” the union said.

They say this position was confirmed in a letter in September 2025 signed by the Foreign Secretary and using text drafted and approved by Downing Street.

Sir Olly said: “I bring this action reluctantly. It would have been unnecessary if the Prime Minister had simply apologised for his mistake and made amends for the distress and cost it has caused me and my family.

“Instead, I now have to ask the Courts to determine that the Prime Minister’s decisions were unlawful, unreasonable and to quash them.”

Downing Street would not be drawn when asked whether Sir Keir stood by his reasoning for sacking the civil servant.

“I think you’ve got the Prime Minister’s own words on on that.

“I just refer you back to his previous statements, but I’m just not going to comment on that particular case now that legal proceedings have begun,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said.

The Conservatives warned of the cost of such a review.

Shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Alex Burghart said: “This Judicial Review will likely cost taxpayers a fortune – once again Labour’s failure in government comes at a price.

“The Mandelson scandal has been a humiliation for Labour from start to finish, and the cover-up still continues.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.